Josephson junction-based axion detection through resonant activation
Roberto Grimaudo, Davide Valenti, Bernardo Spagnolo, Giovanni Filatrella, Claudio Guarcello
arXiv:2201.10971 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.033007 · 2022-01-26 · Physical Review D
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We discuss the resonant activation phenomenon on a Josephson junction due to the coupling of the Josephson system with axions. We show how such an effect can be exploited for axion detection. A nonmonotonic behavior, with a minimum, of the mean switching time from the superconducting to the resistive state versus the ratio of the axion energy and the Josephson plasma energy is found. We demonstrate how variations in switching times make it possible to detect the presence of the axion field. An experimental protocol for observing axions through their coupling with a Josephson system is proposed.
Similar papers
Anomalous transport in biased ac-driven Josephson junctions: Negative conductances
similarity 0.89M. Kostur et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0712.0893
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Voltage drop across Josephson junctions for Lévy noise detection
similarity 0.89Claudio Guarcello et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2006.14299
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson-junction-based axion detection through resonant activation
similarity 0.89Roberto Grimaudo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Frequency Windows of Absolute Negative Conductance in Josephson Junctions
similarity 0.89L. Machura et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0705.2509
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
GHz Superconducting Single-Photon Detectors for Dark Matter Search
similarity 0.88Federico Paolucci & Francesco Giazotto · 2021 · arXiv:2101.08558
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson Coupling in the Dissipative State of a Thermally Hysteretic -SQUID
similarity 0.88Sourav Biswas et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1709.02569
Source status unknown — claims are unverified