FeSe and the missing electron pocket problem
Luke C. Rhodes, Matthias Eschrig, Timur K. Kim, Matthew D. Watson
arXiv:2201.11702 · DOI 10.3389/fphy.2022.859017 · 2022-01-27 · Frontiers in Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The nature and origin of electronic nematicity remains a significant challenge in our understanding of the iron-based superconductors. This is particularly evident in the iron chalcogenide, FeSe, where it is currently unclear how the experimentally determined Fermi surface near the M point evolves from having two electron pockets in the tetragonal state to exhibiting just a single electron pocket in the nematic state. This has posed a major theoretical challenge, which has become known as the missing electron pocket problem of FeSe, and is of central importance if we wish to uncover the secrets behind nematicity and superconductivity in the wider iron-based superconductors. Here, we review the recent experimental work uncovering this nematic Fermi surface of FeSe from both ARPES and STM measurements, as well as current theoretical attempts to explain this missing electron pocket of FeSe, with a particular focus on the emerging importance of incorporating the $d_{xy}$ orbital into theoretical descriptions of the nematic state. Furthermore, we will discuss the consequence this missing electron pocket has on the theoretical understanding of superconductivity in this system and present several remaining open questions and avenues for future research.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
A first-principles study and mesoscopic modeling of two-dimensional spin and orbital fluctuations in FeSe
similarity 0.92Abyay Ghosh et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2403.04802
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Nematic Energy Scale and the Missing Electron Pocket in FeSe
similarity 0.92Ming Yi et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1903.04557
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Highly Anisotropic Superconducting Gap in Nematically Ordered and Tetragonal Phases of FeSeS
similarity 0.92Y. Sato et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1705.09074
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Revealing the single electron pocket of FeSe in a single orthorhombic domain
similarity 0.91Luke C. Rhodes et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2004.04660
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impurity-induced bound states inside the superconducting gap of FeSe
similarity 0.91Lin Jiao et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1709.02590
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic nematicity in FeSe: a first-principles perspective
similarity 0.91Xuanyu Long et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1907.03562
Source status unknown — claims are unverified