Spin fluctuations associated with the collapse of the pseudogap in a cuprate superconductor
M. Zhu, D. J. Voneshen, S. Raymond, O. J. Lipscombe, C. C. Tam, S. M. Hayden
arXiv:2201.11719 · DOI 10.1038/s41567-022-01825-3 · 2022-01-27 · Nature Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Theories of the origin of superconductivity in cuprates are dependent on an understanding of their normal state which exhibits various competing orders. Transport and thermodynamic measurements on La$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$CuO$_4$ show signatures of a quantum critical point, including a peak in the electronic specific heat $C$ versus doping $p$, near the doping $p^{\star}$ where the pseudogap collapses. The fundamental nature of the fluctuations associated with this peak is unclear. Here we use inelastic neutron scattering to show that close to $T_c$ and near $p^{\star}$, there are very-low-energy collective spin excitations with characteristic energies $\hbar Γ\approx$~5 meV. Cooling and applying a 8.8~T magnetic field creates a mixed state with a stronger magnetic response below 10~meV. We conclude that the low-energy spin-fluctuations are due to the collapse of the pseudogap combined with an underlying tendency to magnetic order. We show that the large specific heat near $p^{\star}$ can be understood in terms of collective spin fluctuations. The spin fluctuations we measure exist across the superconducting phase diagram and may be related to the strange metal behaviour observed in overdoped cuprates.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La1.78Sr0.22CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26 | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
Quantum critical fluctuations in an Fe-based superconductor
similarity 0.94Daniel Jost et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2111.07521
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Investigation of hydrogen incorporations in bulk infinite-layer nickelates
similarity 0.94Pascal Puphal et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2204.03023
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in Compositionally-Complex Cuprates with the YBaCuO Structure
similarity 0.93Aditya Raghavan et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2309.12535
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Near-field localization of the boson peak on tantalum films for superconducting quantum devices
similarity 0.93Xiao Guo et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.14316
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dominant Andreev Reflection through Nonlinear Radio-Frequency Transport
similarity 0.93Tingyu Zhang et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2204.01356
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in the parent infinite-layer nickelate NdNiO
similarity 0.93C. T. Parzyck et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.02007
Source status unknown — claims are unverified