Absence of nematic instability in LiFeAs
Michael Wissmann, Federico Caglieris, Xiaochen Hong, Saicharan Aswartham, Anna Vorobyova, Igor Morozov, Bernd Büchner, Christian Hess
arXiv:2202.00077 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.054508 · 2022-01-31 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The relationship between unconventional superconductivity, antiferromagnetism and nematic order in iron-based superconductors (FeSCs) is still highly debated. In many FeSCs superconductivity is in proximity of a nematically and magnetically ordered state. LiFeAs is an exceptional stoichiometric FeSC becoming superconducting below 18 K, without undergoing a structural or magnetic transition. However, some recent experimental studies suggested the existence of finite nematic fluctuations and even a nematic superconducting state. In this study, we employ elastoresistance as a measure of nematic fluctuations in pristine LiFeAs and compare the findings with the elastoresistance of LiFeAs at low Co and V doping levels as well with that of magnetically and nematically ordering NaFeAs. We find LiFeAs and cobalt-doped LiFeAs far away from a nematic instability.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 17 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 16 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Li(Fe0.948Co0.052)As Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 11 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
The upper critical field and its anisotropy in LiFeAs
similarity 0.90J. L. Zhang et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1101.3159
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Local Structure of Mott Insulating Iron Oxychalcogenides LaOFeO ( = S, Se)
similarity 0.89B. Karki et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2002.10305
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
LiFeAs: An Intrinsic FeAs-based Superconductor with Tc = 18K
similarity 0.89Joshua H. Tapp et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0807.2274
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic and structural transitions in LaNaFeAs single crystals
similarity 0.88J. -Q. Yan et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1412.7447
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Widespread orthorhombic fluctuations in the (Sr,Na)FeAs family of superconductors
similarity 0.88Benjamin A. Frandsen et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1809.01764
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tuning the interplay between nematicity and spin fluctuations in NaLiFeAs superconductors
similarity 0.88S. H. Baek et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1805.11876
Source status unknown — claims are unverified