Pure nematic quantum critical point accompanied by a superconducting dome
K. Ishida, Y. Onishi, M. Tsujii, K. Mukasa, M. Qiu, M. Saito, Y. Sugimura, K. Matsuura, Y. Mizukami, K. Hashimoto, T. Shibauchi
arXiv:2202.11674 · DOI 10.1073/pnas.2110501119 · 2022-02-23 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
When a symmetry-breaking phase of matter is suppressed to a quantum critical point (QCP) at absolute zero, quantum-mechanical fluctuations proliferate. Such fluctuations can lead to unconventional superconductivity, as evidenced by the superconducting domes often found near magnetic QCPs in correlated materials. However, it remains unclear whether this superconductivity mechanism holds for QCPs of the electronic nematic phase, characterized by rotational symmetry breaking. Here, we demonstrate from systematic elastoresistivity measurements that nonmagnetic FeSe$_{1-x}$Te$_{x}$ exhibits an electronic nematic QCP showing diverging nematic susceptibility. This finding establishes two nematic QCPs in FeSe-based superconductors with contrasting accompanying phase diagrams. In FeSe$_{1-x}$Te$_{x}$, a superconducting dome is centered at the QCP, whereas FeSe$_{1-x}$S$_{x}$ shows no QCP-associated enhancement of superconductivity. We find that this difference is related to the relative strength of nematic and spin fluctuations. Our results in FeSe$_{1-x}$Te$_{x}$ present the first case in support of the superconducting dome being associated with the pure nematic QCP.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe0.4Te0.6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 14 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 37 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe0.5Te0.5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 14 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Drastic magnetic-field-induced chiral current order and emergent current-bond-field interplay in kagome metals
similarity 0.97Rina Tazai et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.00623
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pairing symmetries of multiple superconducting phases in UTe2: Competition between ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic fluctuations
similarity 0.96Jushin Tei et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2311.04629
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Manipulating the nematic director by magnetic fields in the spin-triplet superconducting state of CuxBi2Se3
similarity 0.95M. Yokoyama et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.09108
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Classification of Lifshitz invariant in multiband superconductors: an application to Leggett modes in the linear response regime in Kagome lattice models
similarity 0.94Raigo Nagashima et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2309.01410
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin fluctuations in the ultranodal superconducting state of Fe(Se,S)
similarity 0.94Yifu Cao et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2404.03846
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fragile pressure-induced magnetism in FeSe superconductors with a thickness reduction
similarity 0.94Jianyu Xie et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2110.15224
Source status unknown — claims are unverified