Revisiting the $^{63}$Cu NMR signature of charge order in La$_{1.875}$Ba$_{0.125}$CuO$_{4}$
T. Imai, P. M. Singer, A. Arsenault, M. Fujita
arXiv:2203.04217 · DOI 10.7566/JPSJ.90.034705 · 2022-03-08
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We use single crystal $^{63}$Cu NMR techniques to revisit the early $^{63}$Cu NQR signature of charge order observed for La$_{1.875}$Ba$_{0.125}$CuO$_{4}$ ($T_{\text{c}} =4$~K) [A. W. Hunt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 82}, 4300 (1999)]. We show that the growth of spin correlations is accelerated below $\sim 80$~K, where the inverse Laplace transform (ILT) T$_{1}$ analysis of the $^{139}$La NMR spin-lattice relaxation curve recently uncovered emergence of the slow components in the lattice and/or charge fluctuations [P. M. Singer et al., {\bf 101}, 174508 (2020)]. From the accurate measurements of the $^{63}$Cu NMR signal intensity, spin echo decay $M(2τ)$, spin-lattice relaxation rate $^{63}1/T_1$, and its density distribution function $P(^{63}1/T_{1})$, we also demonstrate that charge order at $T_{\text{charge}}\simeq 54$~K turns on strong enhancement of spin fluctuations {\it within charge ordered domains}, thereby making the CuO$_2$ planes extremely inhomogeneous. The charge ordered domains grow quickly below $T_{\text{charge}}$, and the volume fraction $F_{\text{CA}}$ of the canonical domains unaffected by charge order gradually diminishes by $\sim 35$~K. This finding agrees with our independent estimations of $F_{\text{CA}}$ based entirely on the $^{139}$La ILTT$_{1}$ analyses, but is in a stark contrast with much slower growth of charge ordered domains observed for La$_{1.885}$Sr$_{0.115}$CuO$_{4}$ from its $T_{\text{charge}}\simeq 80$~K to $T_{\text{c}}\simeq 30$~K.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La1.875Ba0.125CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.885Sr0.115CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 30 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
La139 NMR investigation of the interplay between lattice, charge, and spin dynamics in the charge-ordered high-Tc cuprate La1.875Ba0.125CuO4
similarity 0.92P. M. Singer et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
O NMR study of charge ordered LaSrCuO
similarity 0.92T. Imai & K. Hirota · 2017 · arXiv:1712.09380
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Distribution of the magnetic environment in charge ordered LaSrCuO
similarity 0.92A. Arsenault et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1912.11448
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Orbital Separation of Charge Order and Superconductivity in LaSrCuO
similarity 0.91I. Biało et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2601.01643
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Revisiting Cu63 NMR evidence for charge order in superconducting La1.885Sr0.115CuO4
similarity 0.91T. Imai et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Local Magnetic Order vs. Superconductivity in a Layered Cuprate
similarity 0.90N. Ichikawa et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9910037
Source status unknown — claims are unverified