Uniaxial Pressure Induced Stripe Order Rotation in La$_{1.88}$Sr$_{0.12}$CuO$_4$
Qisi Wang, K. von Arx, D. G. Mazzone, S. Mustafi, M. Horio, J. Küspert, J. Choi, D. Bucher, H. Wo, J. Zhao, W. Zhang, T. C. Asmara, Y. Sassa, M. Månsson, N. B. Christensen, M. Janoschek, T. Kurosawa, N. Momono, M. Oda, M. H. Fischer, T. Schmitt, J. Chang
arXiv:2203.09987 · DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-29465-4 · 2022-03-18 · Nature Communications
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Static stripe order is detrimental to superconductivity. Yet, it has been proposed that transverse stripe fluctuations may enhance the inter-stripe Josephson coupling and thus promote superconductivity. Direct experimental studies of stripe dynamics, however, remain difficult. From a strong-coupling perspective, transverse stripe fluctuations are realized in the form of dynamic "kinks" -- sideways shifting stripe sections. Here, we show how modest uniaxial pressure tuning reorganizes directional kink alignment. Our starting point is La$_{1.88}$Sr$_{0.12}$CuO$_4$, where transverse kink ordering results in a rotation of stripe order away from the crystal axis. Application of mild uniaxial pressure changes the ordering pattern and pins the stripe order to the crystal axis. This reordering occurs at a much weaker pressure than that to detwin the stripe domains and suggests a rather weak transverse stripe stiffness. Weak spatial stiffness and transverse quantum fluctuations are likely key prerequisites for stripes to coexist with superconductivity.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La1.88Sr0.12CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 28 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Spin-excitation anisotropy in the nematic state of detwinned FeSe
similarity 0.93Xingye Lu et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2108.04484
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Bulk domain Meissner state in the ferromagnetic superconductor EuFe(AsP): Consequence of compromise between ferromagnetism and superconductivity
similarity 0.93Wentao Jin et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2204.12094
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dispersionless orbital excitations in (Li,Fe)OHFeSe superconductors
similarity 0.92Qian Xiao et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2110.05361
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase Diagram, -Wave Superconductivity, and Pseudogap of the -- Model at Finite Temperature
similarity 0.92Dai-Wei Qu et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2211.06322
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ferromagnetic inter-layer coupling in FeSeS superconductors revealed by inelastic neutron scattering
similarity 0.92Mingwei Ma et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2407.05548
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tangent Space Approach for Thermal Tensor Network Simulations of the 2D Hubbard Model
similarity 0.92Qiaoyi Li et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2212.11973
Source status unknown — claims are unverified