Superconductivity enhancement in polar metal regions of Sr$_{0.95}$Ba$_{0.05}$TiO$_3$ and Sr$_{0.985}$Ca$_{0.015}$TiO$_3$ revealed by the systematic Nb doping
Yasuhide Tomioka, Naoki Shirakawa, Isao H. Inoue
arXiv:2203.16208 · DOI 10.1038/s41535-022-00524-9 · 2022-03-30 · npj Quantum Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Two different ferroelectric materials, Sr$_{0.95}$Ba$_{0.05}$TiO$_3$ and Sr$_{0.985}$Ca$_{0.015}$TiO$_3$, can be turned into polar metals with broken centrosymmetry via electron doping. Systematic substitution of Nb$^{5+}$ for Ti$^{4+}$ has revealed that these polar metals both commonly show a simple superconducting dome with a single convex shape. Interestingly, the superconducting transition temperature $T_\mathrm{c}$ is enhanced more strongly in these polar metals when compared with the nonpolar matrix Sr(Ti,Nb)O$_3$. The maximum $T_\mathrm{c}$ reaches 0.75K, which is the highest reported value among the SrTiO$_3$-based families to date. However, the $T_\mathrm{c}$ enhancement is unexpectedly lower within the vicinity of the putative ferroelectric quantum critical point. The enhancement then becomes much more prominent at locations further inside the dilute carrier-density region, where the screening is less effective. These results suggest that centrosymmetry breaking, i.e., the ferroelectric nature, does not kill the superconductivity. Instead, it enhances the superconductivity directly, despite the absence of strong quantum fluctuations.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr0.95Ba0.05TiO3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.75 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sr0.985Ca0.015TiO3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.75 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Induced ferroelectricity and enhanced superconductivity through B-site doped SrTi1−xZrxO3
similarity 0.90Stephen Zhang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A ferroelectric quantum phase transition inside the superconducting dome of SrCaTiO
similarity 0.89Carl Willem Rischau et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1703.01495
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum ferroelectric instabilities in superconducting SrTiO3
similarity 0.89J. R. Arce-Gamboa & G. G. Guzmán-Verri
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Variation in superconducting transition temperature due to tetragonal domains in two-dimensionally doped SrTiO3
similarity 0.89Hilary Noad et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Metallicity and superconductivity in doped strontium titanate
similarity 0.89Clément Collignon et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1804.07067
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced Superconducting Transition Temperature due to Tetragonal Domains in Two-Dimensionally Doped SrTiO
similarity 0.89Hilary Noad et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1605.08418
Source status unknown — claims are unverified