Angular dependence of the upper critical induction of clean $s$- and $d_{x^2-y^2}$-wave superconductors with self-consistent ellipsoidal effective mass and Zeeman anisotropies
Aiying Zhao, Qiang Gu, Richard A. Klemm
arXiv:2204.01246 · DOI 10.1088/1361-648X/ac75a4 · 2022-04-04 · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We employ the Schr{ö}dinger-Dirac method generalized to an ellipsoidal effective mass anisotropy in order to treat the spin and orbital effective mass anisotropies self consistently, which is important when Pauli-limiting effects on the upper critical field characteristic of singlet superconductivity are present. By employing the Klemm-Clem transformations to map the equations of motion into isotropic form, we then calculate the upper critical magnetic induction $B_{c2}(θ, φ, T)$ at arbitrary directions and temperatures $T$ for isotropic $s$-wave and for anisotropic $d_{x^2-y^2}$-wave superconducting order parameters. As for anisotropic $s$-wave superconductors, the reduced upper critical field $b_{c2}$ is largest in the direction of the lowest effective mass, and is proportional to the universal orientation factor $α(θ,φ)$. However, for $d_{x^2-y^2}$-wave pairing, ${\bm B}_{c2}(π/2,φ,T)$ exhibits either a four-fold pattern with $C_4$ symmetry just below the transition temperature $T_c$ that rotates by $π/4$ as $T$ is lowered, or a two-fold pattern with $C_2$ symmetry, depending upon the planar effective mass anisotropy. This provides a new method to distinguish these pairing symmetries in clean unconventional superconductors.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| H3S Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 203 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YH10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 243 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MoS2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CeCoIn5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbSe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2.2CaSr1.9Cu2O8+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CeCu2Si2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Simulating dynamical phases of chiral superconductors with a trapped ion magnet
similarity 0.92Athreya Shankar et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2204.05671
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional Josephson supercurrent diode effect induced by chiral spin-orbit coupling
similarity 0.91Andreas Costa et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2411.11570
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anisotropic Diamagnetic Response in Type-II Superconductors with Gap and Fermi-Surface Anisotropies
similarity 0.90H. Adachi et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0411290
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Kapitsa pendulum effects in Josephson junction + nanomagnet under external periodic drive
similarity 0.90K. V. Kulikov et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.01882
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Controlling Collective Phenomena Via the Quantum State of Interaction-Mediators: Changing the Criticality of Photon-Mediated Superconductivity Via Fock States of Light
similarity 0.90Ahana Chakraborty et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2207.07131
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Site-selective NMR for odd-frequency Cooper pairs around vortex in chiral p-wave superconductors
similarity 0.90Kenta K. Tanaka et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1603.00558
Source status unknown — claims are unverified