Revealing Josephson vortex dynamics in proximity junctions below critical current
Vasily S. Stolyarov, Vsevolod Ruzhitskiy, Razmik A. Hovhannisyan, Sergey Yu. Grebenchuk, Andrey G. Shishkin, Igor A. Golovchanskiy, Alexander A. Golubov, Nikolay V. Klenov, Igor I. Soloviev, Mikhail Yu. Kupriyanov, Alexander V. Andriyash, Dimitri Roditchev
arXiv:2204.03937 · DOI 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c00647 · 2022-04-08 · Nano letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Made of a thin non-superconducting metal (N) sandwiched by two superconductors (S), SNS Josephson junctions enable novel quantum functionalities by mixing up the intrinsic electronic properties of N with the superconducting correlations induced from S by proximity. Electronic properties of these devices are governed by Andreev quasiparticles [1] which are absent in conventional SIS junctions whose insulating barrier (I) between the two S electrodes owns no electronic states. Here we focus on the Josephson vortex (JV) motion inside Nb-Cu-Nb proximity junctions subject to electric currents and magnetic fields. The results of local (Magnetic Force Microscopy) and global (transport) experiments provided simultaneously are compared with our numerical model, revealing the existence of several distinct dynamic regimes of the JV motion. One of them, identified as a fast hysteretic entry/escape below the critical value of Josephson current, is analyzed and suggested for low-dissipative logic and memory elements.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 7.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Highly tunable NbTiN Josephson junctions fabricated with focused helium ion beam
similarity 0.89Aki Ruhtinas & Ilari J. Maasilta · 2023 · arXiv:2303.17348
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Visualizing supercurrents in ferromagnetic Josephson junctions with various arrangements of 0 and πsegments
similarity 0.89C. Gürlich et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0911.4831
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson vortex-based memory
similarity 0.88Dmitrii S. Kalashnikov et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2308.09995
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Imaging of order parameter induced phase shifts in cuprate superconductors by low-temperature scanning electron microscopy
similarity 0.88Christian Gürlich et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0908.0490
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Long-range spin-polarized Josephson effect in ballistic S/F/S junctions with precessing magnetization
similarity 0.88E. S. Andriyakhina et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2604.14390
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Confocal Annular Josephson Tunnel Junctions with Large Eccentricity
similarity 0.87Roberto Monaco et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1805.07280
Source status unknown — claims are unverified