Room Temperature Superconductivity: the Roles of Theory and Materials Design
Warren E. Pickett
arXiv:2204.05930 · DOI 10.1103/RevModPhys.95.021001 · 2022-04-12
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
For half a century after the discovery of superconductivity, materials exploration for better superconductors proceeded without knowledge of the underlying mechanism. The 1957 BCS theory cleared that up: the superconducting state occurs due to pairing of electrons over the Fermi surface. Over the following half century higher critical temperature T$_c$ was achieved only serendipitously as new materials were synthesized. Meanwhile the formal theory of phonon-coupled superconductivity at the material-dependent level became highly developed: given a known compound, its value of T$_c$, the superconducting gap function, and several other properties of the superconducting state became available independent of further experimental input. More recently, density functional theory based computational materials design has progressed to a predictive level -- new materials can be predicted on the basis of various numerical algorithms. Taken together, these capabilities enable theoretical prediction of new superconductors. Here the process that resulted in three new highest temperature superconductors, predicted numerically, confirmed experimentally -- SH$_3$, LaH$_{10}$, and YH$_9$ -- is recounted. These hydrides have T$_c$ in the 200-280K range at megabar pressures, and here the development will be chronicled. Current activities and challenges are discussed, together with Regularities in compressed hydrides that can guide further exploration.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Li2MgH16 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 475 | 250 GPa | unknown |
| KB2H8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 140 | 12 GPa | unknown |
| Li1-xBC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 75 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
is a high- superconductor with columnar pinning defects
similarity 0.90Miodrag L. Kulić · 2023 · arXiv:2301.13153
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Machine-learning approach for discovery of conventional superconductors
similarity 0.90Huan Tran & Tuoc N. Vu · 2022 · arXiv:2211.03265
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum and temperature effects on crystal structure of superhydride: A path integral molecular dynamics study
similarity 0.90Yuta Watanabe et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2205.06524
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Potential high- superconductivity in YCeH and LaCeH under pressure
similarity 0.89Peng Song et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2204.01921
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting and topological properties of compound LuHN
similarity 0.89Zheng-Wei Liao et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2405.08684
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Iron-based superconductors: tales from the nuclei
similarity 0.89Pietro Carretta & Giacomo Prando · 2019 · arXiv:1912.02603
Source status unknown — claims are unverified