Magnetic Field Tuning of Parallel Spin Stripe Order and Fluctuations near the Pseudogap Quantum Critical Point in La$_{1.36}$Nd$_{0.4}$Sr$_{0.24}$CuO$_4$
Qianli Ma, Evan M. Smith, Zachary W. Cronkwright, Mirela Dragomir, Gabrielle Mitchell, Barry W. Winn, Travis J. Williams, Bruce D. Gaulin
arXiv:2204.09503 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.214427 · 2022-04-20
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A quantum critical point in the single layer, hole-doped cuprate system La$_{1.6-x}$Nd$_{0.4}$Sr$_x$CuO$_4$ (Nd-LSCO), near $x$ = 0.23 has been proposed as an organizing principle for understanding high temperature superconductivity. Our earlier neutron diffraction work on Nd-LSCO at optimal and high doping revealed static parallel spin stripes to exist out to the QCP and slightly beyond, at $x$ = 0.24 and 0.26. We examine more closely the parallel spin stripe order parameter in Nd-LSCO in both zero magnetic field and fields up to 8 T for H // c in these single crystals. In contrast to earlier studies at lower doping, we observe that H //c in excess of $\sim$ 2.5 T eliminates the incommensurate quasi-Bragg peaks associated with parallel spin stripes. But this elastic scattering is not destroyed by the field; rather it is transferred to commensurate {\textbf{Q} = 0} Bragg positions, implying that the spins participating in the spin stripes have been polarized. Inelastic neutron scattering measurements at high fields show an increase in the low energy, parallel spin stripe fluctuations and evidence for a spin gap, $Δ_{spin}$= 3 $\pm$ 0.5 meV for Nd-LSCO with $x$ = 0.24. This is shown to be consistent with spin gap measurements as a function of superconducting T$_C$ over five different families of cuprate superconductors, which follow the approximate linear relation, $Δ_{spin}$ = 3.5 k$_B$T$_C$.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La1.36Nd0.4Sr0.24CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| La1.37Nd0.4Sr0.23CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Superconductivity from charge order in cuprates
similarity 0.93J. M. Tranquada et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.03421
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Zooming on the Quantum Critical Point in Nd-LSCO
similarity 0.91Olivier Cyr-Choinière et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0909.4218
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Parallel spin stripes and their coexistence with superconducting ground states at optimal and high doping in La1.6−xNd0.4SrxCuO4
similarity 0.91Qianli Ma et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic theory of pseudogap phenomena and unconventional Bose-liquid superconductivity and superfluidity in high- cuprates and other systems
similarity 0.91Dzhumanov, S. · 2020 · arXiv:1912.12407
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting phase coherence in striped cuprates
similarity 0.91Antonio H. Castro Neto · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9702180
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin gap and magnetic coherence in a clean high-T_c superconductor
similarity 0.91B. Lake et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9906456
Source status unknown — claims are unverified