Nonadiabatic transition at a band-touching point
Mohammad-Sadegh Vaezi, Davoud Nasr Esfahani
arXiv:2204.13720 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.013224 · 2022-04-28 · Physical Review Research
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Low-energy Hamiltonians with a linear crossing in their energy dispersion (dubbed Dirac Hamiltonians) have recently been the subject of intense investigations. The linear dispersion is often the result of an approximation in the energy dispersion at the band-touching point in which higher order terms are discarded. In this paper, we show that, in terms of nonadiabatic transitions, by passing through a touching point, certain types of quadratic terms could not be omitted, even in the arbitrary vicinity of it, ie, quadratic terms could significantly affect the transition probability, hence the Hamiltonian is not reducible to a linear one. We further show that the presence of terms with exponents larger than two only affects the transition probability away from the touching point. In the end, we discuss conditions that may lead to the appearance of oscillations in the transition probability profile.
Similar papers
Effective model for a supercurrent in a pair-density wave
similarity 0.87Jonatan Wårdh & Mats Granath · 2017 · arXiv:1703.03781
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multicriticality of Two-dimensional Class D Disordered Topological Superconductors
similarity 0.87Tong Wang et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2108.12133
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum spin liquid from electron-phonon coupling
similarity 0.87Xun Cai et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.04002
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Collisionless dynamics in disordered superconductors
similarity 0.86Maxim Dzero · 2023 · arXiv:2303.06750
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunable zero-energy Dirac and Luttinger nodes in a two-dimensional topological superconductor
similarity 0.86Ryan Mays & Predrag Nikolic · 2022 · arXiv:2206.04065
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Landau-Zener-Stuckelberg interferometry
similarity 0.86S. N. Shevchenko et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0911.1917
Source status unknown — claims are unverified