From superconductor stability and relaxation to Andreev reflections
Harald Reiss
arXiv:2205.09582 · 2022-05-19
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
How exactly can critical temperature be determined from results obtained in resistivity measurements? An unconventional approach using an electrical resistance network is presented in this paper to find an answer to this question. In a first step, a recently suggested, dynamic relaxation model is refined and extended beyond its proper applicability and competence range (superconductor stability against quench). This step addresses bending of the resistivity vs. temperature curves near critical temperature. In a second step, an alternative solution of the thermal fluctuations problem is presented. From both results, existence of a non-local, transition boundary layer can be postulated, a temperature uncertainty around critical temperature. Finally, severe limitations to calculate total current through superconductor/normal conductor thin film junctions become obvious from this approach if any non-Ohmic contributions (like Andreev reflection or Josephson currents) have to be taken into account. This problem is a parallel to multi-component heat transfer.
Similar papers
Superconductor relaxation -- A must to be integrated into stability calculations
similarity 0.91Harald Reiss · 2022 · arXiv:2208.00190
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflection off a fluctuating superconductor in the absence of equilibrium
similarity 0.87P. Devillard et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of Andreev reflection in junctions with iron-based high-Tc superconductors
similarity 0.87Jacob Linder & Asle Sudbø
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity effect and multiple Andreev reflections in diffusive superconductor–normal-metal–superconductor junctions
similarity 0.87J. C. Cuevas et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multiple Andreev reflection and giant excess noise in diffusive superconductor/normal-metal/superconductor junctions
similarity 0.86T. Hoss et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev Reflection in Scanning Tunneling Spectroscopy of Unconventional Superconductors
similarity 0.86P. O. Sukhachov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified