← Back to search

Enhancement of superconductivity on the verge of a structural instability in isovalently doped $β$-ThRh$_{1-x}$Ir$_{x}$Ge

Guorui Xiao, Qinqing Zhu, Yanwei Cui, Wuzhang Yang, Baizhuo Li, Shijie Song, Guang-Han Cao, Zhi Ren

arXiv:2206.02364 · DOI 10.1038/s41535-022-00464-4 · 2022-06-06 · npj Quantum Materials

T35 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

$β$-ThRhGe, the high-temperature polymorph of ThRhGe, is isostructural to the well-known ferromagnetic superconductor URhGe. However, contrary to URhGe, $β$-ThRhGe is nonmagnetic and undergoes an incomplete structural phase transition at 244 K, followed by a superconducting transition below 3.36 K. Here we show that the isovalent substitution of Ir for Rh leads to a strong enhancement of superconductivity by suppressing the structural transition. At $x$ = 0.5, where the structural transition disappears, $T_{\rm c}$ reaches a maximum of 6.88 K. The enhancement of superconductivity is linked to the proximity to a structural quantum critical point at this Ir concentration, as suggested by the analysis of thermodynamic as well as resistivity data. First principles calculations indicate that the Ir doping has little effect on the electronic band dispersion near the Fermi level. $β$-ThRh$_{1-x}$Ir$_{x}$Ge thus provides an excellent platform to study the interplay between superconductivity and structural quantum criticality in actinide-containing compounds.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
ThRhGe

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3.36Pressure not reportedunknown
ThRh0.5Ir0.5Ge

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

6.88Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers