Electron-hole coherence in core-shell nanowires with partial proximity induced superconductivity
Kristjan Ottar Klausen, Anna Sitek, Sigurdur I. Erlingsson, Andrei Manolescu
arXiv:2206.04830 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.035423 · 2022-06-10 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
By solving the Bogoliubov-de Gennes Hamiltonian, the electron-hole coherence within a partially proximitized n-doped semiconductor shell of a core-shell nanowire heterostructure is investigated numerically and compared with the Andreev reflection interpretation of proximity induced superconductivity. Partial proximitization is considered to quantify the effects of a reduced coherence length. Three cases of partial proximitization of the shell are explored: radial, angular and longitudinal. For the radial case, it is found that the boundary conditions impose localization probability maxima in the center of the shell in spite of off-center radial proximitization. The induced superconductivity gap is calculated as a function of the ratio between the proximitized shell thickness and the total shell thickness. In the angular case, the lowest energy state of a hexagonal wire with a single proximitized side is found to display the essence of Andreev reflection, only by lengthwise summation of the localization probability. In the longitudinal case, a clear correspondence with Andreev reflection is seen in the localization probability as a function of length along a half-proximitized wire. The effect of an external magnetic field oriented along the wire is explored.
Similar papers
Electron-hole coherence in core-shell nanowires with partial proximity-induced superconductivity
similarity 0.91Kristjan Ottar Klausen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electric and Magnetic Field-dependent Tunneling between Coupled Nanowires
similarity 0.90Shashank Anand et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.01936
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic theory of the proximity effect in superconductor-graphene nanostructures
similarity 0.89P. Burset et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0802.2055
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional Pairing in Heavy Fermion Metals
similarity 0.88J. A. Sauls & D. Rainer · 1996 · arXiv:cond-mat/9610033
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev current and subgap conductance of spin-valve SFF structures
similarity 0.88A. S. Vasenko et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1208.4741
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Exploring the vortex phase diagram of Bogoliubov-de Gennes disordered superconductors
similarity 0.88Bo Fan & Antonio M. García-García · 2022 · arXiv:2205.12347
Source status unknown — claims are unverified