Modulation doping of the FeSe monolayer on SrTiO$_3$
Fengmiao Li, Ilya Elfimov, George A. Sawatzky
arXiv:2206.11945 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.214518 · 2022-06-23
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The discovery of higher-temperature superconductivity in FeSe monolayers on SrTiO$_3$ (STO) substrates has sparked a surge of interest in the interface superconductivity. One point of the agreement reached to date is that modulation doping by impurities in the substrate is critical for the enhanced superconductivity. Remarkably, the universal doping of about 0.1 electrons per Fe, \textit{i.e.}, so-called ``magic'' doping, has been observed on a range of Ti oxide substrates, which concludes that there likely is some important interaction limiting the FeSe doping. Our study discovers that the polarization change at the interface Se because of the close proximity to the substrate from that in the free-standing FeSe film significantly amplifies the total potential difference at the interface above and beyond the work function difference for charge transfer. Additionally, the titanate substrate with a large number of free electrons basically serves as an ``infinite'' charge reservoir, which leads to the saturated FeSe doping with the complete removal of interface potential gradient. Our work has developed the theory for modulation doping in the Van der Waals materials/oxides heterostructure, providing a solution to the puzzle of ``magic'' doping in FeSe monolayers on titanates. The information also presents experimental pathways to accommodate a variable carrier density of FeSe monolayers via modulation doping.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 65 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 40 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Metamorphoses of electronic structure of FeSe-based superconductors (Review article)
similarity 0.93Yu. V. Pustovit & A. A. Kordyuk · 2016 · arXiv:1608.07751
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Direct probing of a large spin-orbit coupling in the FeSe superconducting monolayer on STO: Evidence for nontrivial topological states
similarity 0.91Khalil Zakeri et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.02810
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in FeSe thin films driven by the interplay between nematic fluctuations and spin-orbit coupling
similarity 0.90Jian Kang & Rafael M. Fernandes · 2016 · arXiv:1606.01170
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional density waves and superconductivities in Fe-based superconductors and other strongly correlated electron systems
similarity 0.89Hiroshi Kontani et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2209.00539
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On the origin of the shallow and "replica" bands in FeSe monolayer superconductors
similarity 0.89I. A. Nekrasov et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1702.00949
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magic Doping and Robust Superconductivity in Monolayer FeSe on Titanates
similarity 0.89Tao Jia et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2101.04787
Source status unknown — claims are unverified