Dynamical screening and excitonic bound states in biased bilayer graphene
Harley D. Scammell, Oleg P. Sushkov
arXiv:2207.03260 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.085104 · 2022-07-07 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Excitonic bound states are characterised by a binding energy $ε_b$ and a single-particle band gap $Δ_b$. This work provides a theoretical description for both strong ($ε_b\simΔ_b$) and weak ($ε_b\llΔ_b$) excitonic bound states, with particular application to biased bilayer graphene. Standard description of excitons is based on a wave function that is determined by a Schrödinger-like equation with screened attractive potential. The wave function approach is valid only in the weak binding regime $ε_b\llΔ_b$. The screening depends on frequency (dynamical screening) and this implies retardation. In the case of strong binding, $ε_b\simΔ_b$, a wave function description is not possible due to the retardation. Instead we appeal to the Bethe-Salpeter equation, written in terms of the electron-hole Green's function, to solve the problem. So far only the weak binding regime has been achieved experimentally. Our analysis demonstrates that the strong binding regime is also possible and we specify conditions in which it can be achieved for the prototypical example of biased bilayer graphene. The conditions concern the bias, the configuration of gates, and the substrate material. To verify the accuracy of our analysis we compare with available data for the weak binding regime. We anticipate applying the developed dynamical screening Bethe-Salpeter techniques to various 2D materials with strong binding.
Similar papers
Two-dimensional altermagnets: Superconductivity in a minimal microscopic model
similarity 0.90Bjørnulf Brekke et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2308.08606
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
"Universal" in Fe Based Superconductors
similarity 0.89Siddhant Panda & P. J. Hirschfeld · 2023 · arXiv:2306.05512
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Physics of the Majorana-superconducting qubit hybrids
similarity 0.89D. B. Karki et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2309.08758
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity of anomalous pseudospin
similarity 0.89Han Gyeol Suh et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2301.11458
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dielectric waveguide setup tested with a superconducting millimeter-wave Fabry-Pérot interferometer at milli-Kelvin temperatures
similarity 0.89Jakob Lenschen et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2411.15058
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Limitations of the current-phase relation measurements by an asymmetric dc-SQUID
similarity 0.89Ian Babich et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.02705
Source status unknown — claims are unverified