Spin singlet and quasiparticles excitations in cuprate superconductors
M. Mezidi, A. Alekhin, G. D. Gu, D. Colson, S. Houver, M. Cazayous, Y. Gallais, A. Sacuto
arXiv:2207.10166 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.174513 · 2022-07-20 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We followed step by step the transition from an antiferromagnetic (AF) Mott insulator to a superconducting (SC) metal in the Bi$_2$Sr$_2$CaCu$_{2}$O$_{8+δ}$ (Bi-2212) cuprate using the electronic Raman scattering spectroscopy. This was achieved by tracking the doping dependence of the spin singlet excitation originate from the AF Mott insulator, the normal state quasiparticles excitation related to the mobile charge carriers and the Bogoliubov quasiparticles related to the SC gap. We show that the signature of the pseudogap phase which develops during this transition, can be interpreted as the blocking of charge carriers by the enhancement of the antiferromagnetic correlations as the temperature drops. We find that the energy scale of the pseudogap, $Δ_{\textrm{pg}}(p)$, closely follows the one of the spin singlet excitation, $Δ_{\textrm{sse}}(p)$, with doping $p$. The quasiparticles lifetime considerably increases with doping when the pseudogap collapses. We reveal that the maximum amplitude of the SC gap, $Δ_{\textrm{sc}}^{\textrm{max}}$ and the SC transition temperature \Tc are linked in an extended range of doping such as $Δ_{\textrm{sc}}^{\textrm{max}}(p) \propto Δ_{\textrm{sse}}(p)\, T_c(p)$. This relation suggests that the AF correlations play a key role in the mechanism of superconductivity.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 90 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Spin singlet and quasiparticle excitations in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.94M. Mezidi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Collapse of the Normal State Pseudogap at a Lifshitz Transition in BiSrCaCuO Cuprate Superconductor
similarity 0.93S. Benhabib et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1403.7620
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Intimate link between Charge Density Wave, Pseudogap and Superconducting Energy Scales in Cuprates
similarity 0.91B. Loret et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1808.08198
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Novel magnetic order in pseudogap state of high Tc copper oxides superconductors
similarity 0.91Philippe Bourges & Yvan Sidis · 2011 · arXiv:1101.1786
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Gap and Pseudogap in Bi-2212
similarity 0.90Matthias Opel et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9906448
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticle interference patterns as a test for the nature of the pseudogap phase in the cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.90T. Pereg-Barnea & M. Franz · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0401594
Source status unknown — claims are unverified