Comparative study between three models for the levitation height calculation
Nabin K. Raut, Jeffery Miller, Raymond Y. Chiao, Jay E. Sharping
arXiv:2207.13257 · 2022-07-27
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Magnetic levitation has been demonstrated and characterized within the coaxial microwave cavity [1,2]. A permanent neodymium magnet is levitated from the edge of the finite-size superconductor [3,4]. One challenge is to develop a better method to calculate levitation height [5]. This paper compares three models, the Mirror method, finite-size superconductor, and two-loop model, for the levitation height calculation. The limitations and advantages of each model are discussed in detail.
Similar papers
Calculation of levitation forces in permanent-superconductor systems
similarity 0.86M. J. Qin et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0111316
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic levitation force of semi-infinite type-II superconductors
similarity 0.84Mark W. Coffey
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamic modeling of levitation of a superconducting bulk by coupled -magnetic field and Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian formulations
similarity 0.83Francesco Grilli et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1807.00329
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Estimation of maximum possible trapped field in superconducting permanent magnets in 2D and 3D
similarity 0.83Víctor M. R. Zermeño et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1606.01817
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two-dimensional model of a high-Tc superconducting dynamo
similarity 0.83Leonid Prigozhin & Vladimir Sokolovsky · 2020 · arXiv:2011.03524
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stiffness and energy losses in cylindrically symmetric superconductor levitating systems
similarity 0.83Carles Navau & Alvaro Sanchez · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0206524
Source status unknown — claims are unverified