Eavesdropping on competing condensates by the edge supercurrent in a Weyl superconductor
Stephan Kim, Shiming Lei, Leslie M. Schoop, R. J. Cava, N. P. Ong
arXiv:2208.00933 · 2022-08-01
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In a topological insulator the metallic surface states are easily distinguished from the insulating bulk states (FuKane07). By contrast, in a topological superconductor (FuKane08,Qi,FuBerg,Oppen), much less is known about the relationship between an edge supercurrent and the bulk pair condensate. Can we force their pairing symmetries to be incompatible? In the superconducting state of the Weyl semimetal MoTe$_2$, an edge supercurrent is observed as oscillations in the current-voltage (\emph{I-V}) curves induced by fluxoid quantization (Wang). We have found that the $s$-wave pairing potential of supercurrent injected from niobium contacts is incompatible with the intrinsic pair condensate in MoTe$_2$. The incompatibility leads to strong stochasticity in the switching current $I_c$ as well as other anomalous properties such as an unusual antihysteretic behavior of the ``wrong'' sign. Under supercurrent injection, the fluxoid-induced edge oscillations survive to much higher magnetic fields \emph{H}. Interestingly, the oscillations are either very noisy or noise-free depending on the pair potential that ends up dictating the edge pairing. Using the phase noise as a sensitive probe that eavesdrops on the competiting bulk states, we uncover an underlying blockade mechanism whereby the intrinsic condensate can pre-emptively block proximitization by the Nb pair potential depending on the history.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| MoTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MoTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.85 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Observation of an edge supercurrent in the Weyl superconductor MoTe
similarity 0.92Wudi Wang et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1911.08598
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetoresistance hysteresis in the superconduting state of Kagome CsVSb
similarity 0.86Tian Le et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2406.13164
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Odd-frequency pairs and anomalous proximity effect in nematic and chiral states of superconducting topological insulators
similarity 0.86Takeshi Mizushima et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2208.04677
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Signatures of a topological phase transition in a planar Josephson junction
similarity 0.86A. Banerjee et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.03453
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting proximity effects in metals with a repulsive pairing interaction
similarity 0.86Oriol T. Valls et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1010.0586
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity effects in superconductor-ferromagnet heterostructures
similarity 0.86A. I. Buzdin · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0505583
Source status unknown — claims are unverified