Hall Sensor Based Measurements of the Magnetic Phase Diagram of Superconducting Vanadium
Eshan Kemp, Daniel P. Newton, Ricky Parada
arXiv:2209.01324 · 2022-09-03
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Vanadium is an elemental type-II superconductor which has a pure superconducting phase, a vortex phase, and a non-superconducting phase. We designed and carried out a low-budget experiment in our undergraduate physics lab to measure the magnetic field a close distance from the surface of a pure Vanadium disk sample isothermally with a Hall sensor across a range of different temperatures and external magnetic fields. We then used these measurements to compute the superconducting phase diagram of Vanadium. After completing measurements at eight temperatures ranging from 2.6K to 5K and magnetic fields ranging from -0.2T to 0.2T, we were able to detect the Meissner phase (clearly), and a vortex phase (less clearly). Using the graphs of the hall bar magnetic field versus external magnetic field, we were able to derive a rough estimate for the upper critical field and the lower critical field of Vanadium at the eight temperatures wherein we conducted measurements. The results are in general accord with the phase diagram of Vanadium found in the literature, except that the critical temperature appears to be less than 5.43K and 5.13K (about 4.8K). Further, we observed critical fields lower than those found in the literature. We hypothesize this is due mostly to impurities in our Vanadium sample (purchased through Amazon.com), which would reduce the measured critical temperature below that of pure Vanadium, consistent with our results.
Similar papers
From Branched Flow to Superwires in Periodic Potentials
similarity 0.90Alvar Daza et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2103.08943
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pseudogap in \(Sr_{2-x}La_{x}IrO_{4}\): Gor'kov-Teitel'baum thermal activation model
similarity 0.90Jalaja Pandya et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2401.14165
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stability of interlinked neutron vortex and proton flux-tube arrays in a neutron star -- III. Proton feedback
similarity 0.83K. H. Thong et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2305.04482
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superlight pairs in face-centred-cubic extended Hubbard models with strong Coulomb repulsion
similarity 0.83G D Adebanjo et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2109.03031
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nernst response, viscosity and mobile entropy in vortex liquids
similarity 0.83Kamran Behnia · 2022 · arXiv:2212.09480
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Speeding up qubit control with bipolar single-flux-quantum pulse sequences
similarity 0.83Vsevolod Vozhakov et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2310.11484
Source status unknown — claims are unverified