Weak-signal extraction enabled by deep-neural-network denoising of diffraction data
Jens Oppliger, M. Michael Denner, Julia Küspert, Ruggero Frison, Qisi Wang, Alexander Morawietz, Oleh Ivashko, Ann-Christin Dippel, Martin von Zimmermann, Izabela Biało, Leonardo Martinelli, Benoît Fauqué, Jaewon Choi, Mirian Garcia-Fernandez, Ke-Jin Zhou, Niels B. Christensen, Tohru Kurosawa, Naoki Momono, Migaku Oda, Fabian D. Natterer, Mark H. Fischer, Titus Neupert, Johan Chang
arXiv:2209.09247 · DOI 10.1038/s42256-024-00790-1 · 2022-09-19 · Nature Machine Intelligence
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Removal or cancellation of noise has wide-spread applications for imaging and acoustics. In every-day-life applications, denoising may even include generative aspects, which are unfaithful to the ground truth. For scientific use, however, denoising must reproduce the ground truth accurately. Here, we show how data can be denoised via a deep convolutional neural network such that weak signals appear with quantitative accuracy. In particular, we study X-ray diffraction on crystalline materials. We demonstrate that weak signals stemming from charge ordering, insignificant in the noisy data, become visible and accurate in the denoised data. This success is enabled by supervised training of a deep neural network with pairs of measured low- and high-noise data. We demonstrate that using artificial noise does not yield such quantitatively accurate results. Our approach thus illustrates a practical strategy for noise filtering that can be applied to challenging acquisition problems.
Similar papers
Structural and Superconducting Properties of Ultrathin Ir Films on Nb(110)
similarity 0.88Philip Beck et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2112.11804
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin Excitations of High Spin Iron(II) in Metal-Organic Chains on Metal and Superconductor
similarity 0.88Jung-Ching Liu et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2409.20312
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Structural Phase Transition and Superconductivity in 2H-BaGaGe with Buckled Honeycomb Layers
similarity 0.87Dorota I. Walicka et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2305.13017
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dispersion kinks from electronic correlations in an unconventional iron-based superconductor
similarity 0.87Ming-Hua Chang et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.23044
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity-Induced Superconductivity in Atomically Precise Nanographene
similarity 0.87Jung-Ching Liu et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2202.00460
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge and spin order dichotomy in NdNiO driven by SrTiO capping layer
similarity 0.87G. Krieger et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2112.03341
Source status unknown — claims are unverified