Suppression and revival of superconducting phase coherence in monolayer FeSe/SrTiO$_3$
H. Ru, Z. J. Li, S. Y. Wang, B. K. Xiang, Y. H. Wang
arXiv:2209.10744 · DOI 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c03587 · 2022-09-22 · Nano letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Monolayer FeSe grown on SrTiO$_3$ (FeSe/STO) is an interfacial high temperature superconductor distinctively different from bulk FeSe. Due to the fragility of this two-dimensional system in the atmosphere, the investigation of its intrinsic superconductivity and intertwined orders has largely been limited to surface-sensitive charge probes compatible with ultra-high vacuum environment. However, the superconducting phase coherence of the interface is challenging to probe. Here, we perform in-situ mutual inductance in ultra-high vacuum on FeSe/STO in combination with band mapping by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES). We find that even though the monolayer showed a gap-closing temperature above 50 K, surprisingly no diamagnetism is visible down to 5 K. This is the case for few-layer FeSe/STO until it exceeds a critical number of 5 layers where diamagnetism suddenly appears. But the superfluid density does not saturate down to the base temperature in these thick samples. On the other hand, the suppression of diamagnetism in the few-layer FeSe/STO can be lifted by depositing a FeTe layer on top. The superconducting transition is much sharper than that in the thick FeSe/STO. However, Tc and superfluid density both decrease with increasing FeTe thickness. Shining ultraviolet light on the FeTe/FeSe/STO heterostructure enhances Tc similarly independent of the FeSe thickness, showing that the diamagnetism originates at the FeSe/STO interface. Our observation may be understood by a scenario in which interfacial superconducting phase coherence is highly anisotropic.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 50 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconductivity in single-layer films of FeSe with a transition temperature above 100 K
similarity 0.93Jian-Feng Ge et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1406.3435
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Atomically Resolved FeSe/SrTiO3(001) Interface Structure by Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy
similarity 0.92Fangsen Li et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1512.05203
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Incoherent Cooper pairing and pseudogap behavior in single-layer FeSe/SrTiO
similarity 0.92Brendan D. Faeth et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2010.11984
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Atomic-site dependent pairing gap in monolayer FeSe/SrTiO(001)- ()
similarity 0.92Cui Ding et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2312.10723
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High superconductivity at the FeSe/SrTiO Interface
similarity 0.92Fa Wang et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1202.4141
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic interactions in FeSe studied by first principle calculations
similarity 0.92Shuai Wang & Fa Wang · 2015 · arXiv:1510.05476
Source status unknown — claims are unverified