Orbital-selective time-domain signature of nematicity dynamics in the charge-density-wave phase of La$_{1.65}$Eu$_{0.2}$Sr$_{0.15}$CuO$_4$
Martin Bluschke, Naman K. Gupta, Hoyoung Jang, Ali A. Husain, Byungjune Lee, MengXing Na, Brandon Dos Remedios, Steef Smit, Peter Moen, Sang-Youn Park, Minseok Kim, Dogeun Jang, Hyeongi Choi, Ronny Sutarto, Alexander H. Reid, Georgi L. Dakovski, Giacomo Coslovich, Quynh L. Nguyen, Nicolas G. Burdet, Ming-Fu Lin, Alexandre Revcolevschi, Jae-Hoon Park, Jochen Geck, Joshua J. Turner, Andrea Damascelli, David G. Hawthorn
arXiv:2209.11528 · DOI 10.1073/pnas.2400727121 · 2022-09-23 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Understanding the interplay between charge, nematic, and structural ordering tendencies in cuprate superconductors is critical to unraveling their complex phase diagram. Using pump-probe time-resolved resonant x-ray scattering on the (0 0 1) Bragg peak at the Cu $L_3$ and O $K$ resonances, we investigate non-equilibrium dynamics of $Q_a = Q_b = 0$ nematic order and its association with both charge density wave (CDW) order and lattice dynamics in La$_{1.65}$Eu$_{0.2}$Sr$_{0.15}$CuO$_4$. The orbital selectivity of the resonant x-ray scattering cross-section allows nematicity dynamics associated with the planar O 2$p$ and Cu 3$d$ states to be distinguished from the response of anisotropic lattice distortions. A direct time-domain comparison of CDW translational-symmetry breaking and nematic rotational-symmetry breaking reveals that these broken symmetries remain closely linked in the photoexcited state, consistent with the stability of CDW topological defects in the investigated pump fluence regime.
Similar papers
Charge Density Fluctuations with Enhanced Superconductivity at the Proposed Nematic Quantum Critical Point
similarity 0.95Youzhe Chen et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.03956
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dispersionless orbital excitations in (Li,Fe)OHFeSe superconductors
similarity 0.94Qian Xiao et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2110.05361
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Contrasting electron-phonon interaction between electron- and hole-doped cuprates
similarity 0.94Qinda Guo et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.01685
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous Josephson Effect in Topological Insulator-Based Josephson Trijunction
similarity 0.94Xiang Zhang et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2112.08646
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Scanning SQUID study of ferromagnetism and superconductivity in infinite-layer nickelates
similarity 0.94Ruby A. Shi et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2402.14559
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Beyond the standard model of topological Josephson junctions: From crystalline anisotropy to finite-size and diode effects
similarity 0.94Barış Pekerten et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2406.05829
Source status unknown — claims are unverified