Andreev processes in mesoscopic multi-terminal graphene Josephson junctions
Fan Zhang, Asmaul Smitha Rashid, Mostafa Tanhayi Ahari, Wei Zhang, Krishnan Mekkanamkulam Ananthanarayanan, Run Xiao, George J. de Coster, Matthew J. Gilbert, Nitin Samarth, Morteza Kayyalha
arXiv:2210.04408 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.L140503 · 2022-10-10 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
There is growing interest in using multi-terminal Josephson junctions (MTJJs) as a platform to artificially emulate topological phases and to investigate complex superconducting mechanisms such as quartet and multiplet Cooper pairings. Current experimental signatures in MTJJs have led to conflicting interpretations of the salient features. In this work, we report a collaborative experimental and theoretical investigation of graphene-based four-terminal Josephson junctions. We observe resonant features in the differential resistance maps that resemble those ascribed to multiplet Cooper pairings. To understand these features, we model our junctions using a circuit network of coupled two-terminal resistively and capacitively shunted junctions (RCSJs). Under appropriate bias current, the model predicts that a current flowing between two diagonal terminals in a four-terminal geometry may be represented as a sinusoidal function of a weighted sum of the superconducting phases. We show that starting from a semi-classical model with diffusive current-phase relations, the MTJJ effectively emulates a general form of the expected current-phase relation for multiplet Cooper pairings. Our study therefore suggests that differential resistance measurements alone are insufficient to conclusively distinguish resonant Andreev reflection processes from semi-classical circuit-network effects.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| MoRe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Phase-engineering the Andreev band structure of a three-terminal Josephson junction
similarity 0.93M. Coraiola et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.14535
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Selective Control of Conductance Modes in Multi-terminal Josephson Junctions
similarity 0.92Gino V. Graziano et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.01373
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic field-bias current interplay in HgTe-based three-terminal Josephson junctions
similarity 0.91J. Thieme et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2512.12328
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Engineering the Floquet spectrum of superconducting multiterminal quantum dots
similarity 0.89Régis Mélin et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1903.04889
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux-tunable Josephson Effect in a Four-Terminal Junction
similarity 0.88Christian G. Prosko et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2311.17158
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasi--periodic supercurrent at quantum Hall transitions
similarity 0.88Ivan Villani et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2503.15384
Source status unknown — claims are unverified