Reply to `Comment on "Absence versus Presence of Dissipative Quantum Phase Transition in Josephson Junctions"'
Kanta Masuki, Hiroyuki Sudo, Masaki Oshikawa, Yuto Ashida
arXiv:2210.10361 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.199702 · 2022-10-19 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We reply to the comments on our previous paper Physical Review Letters, Vol. 129, 087001 (2022), raised by Théo Sépulcre, Serge Florens, and Izak Snyman in arXiv:2210.00742.
Similar papers
Comment on "Absence versus Presence of Dissipative Quantum Phase Transition in Josephson Junctions''
similarity 0.89Théo Sépulcre et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.00742
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Absence versus Presence of Dissipative Quantum Phase Transition in Josephson Junctions
similarity 0.88Kanta Masuki et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2111.13710
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Functional Renormalization Group Approach to Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics
similarity 0.85Takeru Yokota et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2208.14107
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nature of the Schmid transition in a resistively shunted Josephson junction
similarity 0.85Romain Daviet & Nicolas Dupuis
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reentrant superconductivity and superconductor-to-insulator transition in a naturally occurring Josephson junction array tuned by RF power
similarity 0.85S. Avraham et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2509.02063
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On the nature of the Schmid transition in a resistively shunted Josephson junction
similarity 0.85Romain Daviet & Nicolas Dupuis · 2023 · arXiv:2307.04835
Source status unknown — claims are unverified