Vector graphics extraction and analysis of electrical resistance data in Nature volume 586, pages 373-377 (2020)
James J. Hamlin
arXiv:2210.10766 · 2022-10-19
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In this paper, I present an analysis of the electrical resistance graphs in Nature volume 586, pages 373-377 (2020), which reported the discovery of room temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride and was subsequently retracted on September 26th, 2022. I show that, over a single temperature interval, the electrical resistance data can be decomposed into at least two signals of differing digital precision, thus raising questions concerning the methods used to obtain the published data. Since the raw data-files for the electrical resistance measurements have not been made available, in order to perform this analysis, I have developed a set of python scripts to extract the data-points with high precision from the internal structure of the vector graphics image files. I describe the data extraction method. Example code and the resulting electrical resistance vs temperature data-files are made available in public repositories.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Be22Re Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | 15 GPa | unknown |
Similar papers
Understanding Hydrogen Rich Superconductors: Importance of Effective Mass and Dirty Limit
similarity 0.99Andrew L. Cornelius et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2202.04254
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Trends in electronic structures and -wave pairing for the rare-earth series in bilayer nickelate superconductor NiO
similarity 0.97Yang Zhang et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2308.07386
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic structure, magnetic correlations, and superconducting pairing in the reduced Ruddlesden-Popper bilayer LaNiO under pressure: different role of orbital compared with LaNiO
similarity 0.97Yang Zhang et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2310.17871
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Novel results obtained by modeling of dynamic processes in superconductors: phase-slip centers as cooling engines
similarity 0.96Iris Mowgood et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2211.01286
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of the Little-Parks effect in spin-triplet superconductors
similarity 0.96Chengyun Hua et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2212.04591
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
LaBaCuO as a superconducting Rosetta Stone
similarity 0.96John M. Tranquada · 2023 · arXiv:2310.15381
Source status unknown — claims are unverified