Theory of strong down-conversion in multi-mode cavity and circuit QED
Nitish Mehta, Cristiano Ciuti, Roman Kuzmin, Vladimir E. Manucharyan
arXiv:2210.14681 · 2022-10-26
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We revisit the superstrong coupling regime of multi-mode cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED), defined to occur when the frequency of vacuum Rabi oscillations between the qubit and the nearest cavity mode exceeds the cavity's free spectral range. A novel prediction is made that the cavity's linear spectrum, measured in the vanishing power limit, can acquire an intricate fine structure associated with the qubit-induced cascades of coherent single-photon down-conversion processes. This many-body effect is hard to capture by a brute-force numerics and it is sensitive to the light-matter coupling parameters both in the infra-red and the ultra-violet limits. We focused at the example case of a superconducting fluxonium qubit coupled to a long transmission line section. The conversion rate in such a circuit QED setup can readily exceed a few MHz, which is plenty to overcome the usual decoherence processes. Analytical calculations were made possible by an unconventional gauge choice, in which the qubit circuit interacts with radiation via the flux/charge variable in the low-/high-frequency limits, respectively. Our prediction of the fine spectral structure lays the foundation for the "strong down-conversion" regime in quantum optics, in which a single photon excited in a non-linear medium spontaneously down-converts faster than it is absorbed.
Similar papers
Characteristic spectra of circuit quantum electrodynamics systems from the ultrastrong- to the deep-strong-coupling regime
similarity 0.92Yoshihara, Fumiki et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1612.00121
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Semiclassical dynamics of a superconducting circuit: chaotic dynamics and fractal attractors
similarity 0.92Davide Stirpe et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.17492
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Atomic physics and quantum optics using superconducting circuits
similarity 0.91J. Q. You & Franco Nori · 2012 · arXiv:1202.1923
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Accurate methods for the analysis of strong-drive effects in parametric gates
similarity 0.91Alexandru Petrescu et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.02343
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cavity QED with hybrid nanocircuits: from atomic-like physics to condensed matter phenomena
similarity 0.90Audrey Cottet et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1709.00466
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cavity Quantum Materials
similarity 0.90Frank Schlawin et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2112.15018
Source status unknown — claims are unverified