Ion-beam Assisted Sputtering of Titanium Nitride Thin Films
Timothy Draher, Tomas Polakovic, Juliang Li, Yi Li, Ulrich Welp, Jidong Samuel Jiang, John Pearson, Whitney Armstrong, Zein-Eddine Meziani, Clarence Chang, Wai-Kwong Kwok, Zhili Xiao, Valentine Novosad
arXiv:2210.15065 · DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-31549-0 · 2022-10-26 · Scientific Reports
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Titanium nitride is a material of interest for many superconducting devices such as nanowire microwave resonators and photon detectors. Thus, controlling the growth of TiN thin films with desirable properties is of high importance. In previous work on niobium nitride, ion beam-assisted sputtering (IBAS) reduced nitrogen sensitivity during deposition in tandem with an increase in nominal critical temperature. We have deposited thin films of titanium nitride by both, the conventional method of DC reactive magnetron sputtering and the IBAS method and compare their superconducting critical temperatures Tc as functions of thickness, sheet resistance, and nitrogen flow rate. We perform electrical and structural characterizations by electric transport and X-ray diffraction measurements. Compared to the conventional method of reactive sputtering, the IBAS technique has demonstrated a 10% increase in nominal critical temperature and 33% reduced sensitivity to nitrogen flow, without noticeable variation in the lattice structure. Additionally, we explore the behavior of superconducting Tc in ultra-thin films. Trends in films grown at high nitrogen concentrations follow predictions of mean-field theory in disordered films and show suppression of superconducting Tc due to geometric effects, while nitride films grown at low nitrogen concentrations strongly deviate from the theoretical models.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| TiN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| TiN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Direct evidence of a charge depletion region at the interface of Van der Waals monolayers and dielectric oxides: The case of superconducting FeSe/STO
similarity 1.00Khalil Zakeri et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.02058
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transport properties and doping evolution of the Fermi surface in cuprates
similarity 1.00Benjamin Klebel-Knobloch et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.05254
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantifying the effects of dissipation and temperature on dynamics of a superconducting qubit-cavity system
similarity 1.00Prashant Shukla · 2022 · arXiv:2207.04619
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Externally-triggerable optical pump-probe scanning tunneling microscopy with a time resolution of tens-picosecond
similarity 0.99Katsuya Iwaya et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2301.11523
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unusually weak irradiation effects in anisotropic iron-based superconductor RbCa2Fe4As4F2
similarity 0.99Daniele Torsello et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2401.08279
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional pairing in few-fermion systems at finite temperature
similarity 0.99Daniel Pęcak & Tomasz Sowiński · 2022 · arXiv:2202.07639
Source status unknown — claims are unverified