Neglected $U(1)$ phase in the Schroedinger representation of quantum mechanics and particle number conserving formalisms for superconductivity
Hiroyasu Koizumi
arXiv:2211.08759 · DOI 10.1088/1751-8121/acff51 · 2022-11-16 · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconductivity is reformulated as a phenomenon in which a stable velocity field is created by a $U(1)$ phase neglected by Dirac in the Schroedinger representation of quantum mechanics. The neglected phase gives rise to a $U(1)$ gauge field expressed as the Berry connection from many-body wave functions. The inclusion of this gauge field transforms the standard particle-number non-conserving formalism of superconductivity to a particle-number conserving one with many results of the former unaltered. In other words, the new formalism indicates that the current standard one is an approximation that effectively takes into account this neglected $U(1)$ gauge field by employing the particle-number non-conserving formalism. Since the standard and new formalisms are physically different, conflicting results are predicted in some cases. We reexamine the Josephson relation and show that a capacitance contribution of the Josephson junction to the $U(1)$ phase is missing in the standard formalism, and inclusion of it indicates that the standard theory actually does one agree with the experiment while the new one does. It is also shown that the dissipative quantum phase transition in Josephson junctions predicted in the standard theory does not exit in the new one in accordance with the recent experimental result.
Similar papers
Supercurrent Diode Effect, Spin Torques, and Robust Zero-Energy Peak in Planar Half-Metallic Trilayers
similarity 0.90Klaus Halterman et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2111.01242
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum-critical dynamics of a Josephson junction at the topological transition
similarity 0.90Vladislav D. Kurilovich et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2102.05686
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Berry connection from many-body wave functions and superconductivity: Circuit quantization for superconducting qubits and absence of a dissipative quantum phase transition in Josephson junctions
similarity 0.90Hiroyasu Koizumi · 2021 · arXiv:2108.05468
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin currents driven by the Higgs mode in magnetic superconductors
similarity 0.90Mikhail A. Silaev et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1907.00539
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson effect between superconducting nanograins with discrete energy levels
similarity 0.90Dominique Gobert et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0305361
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamic processes in superconductors and the laws of thermodynamics
similarity 0.90A. V. Nikulov · 2021 · arXiv:2110.00386
Source status unknown — claims are unverified