Fragile electronic superconductivity in Bi Single crystal
Anil Kumar, Rajendra Loke, Arindam Pramanik, Rajdeep Sensarma, Sitaram Ramakrishnan, Om Prakash, Biplab Bag, Arumugam Thamizhavel, Srinivasan Ramakrishnan
arXiv:2212.03543 · DOI 10.1103/physrevb.108.224512 · 2022-12-07 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
It was presumed that semimetal Bismuth (Bi) would not show superconductivity (SC) even at ultra-low temperatures ($<$10 mK) due to its very low carrier density ($\approx 3\times10^{17}$cm$^{-3}$). Recently, we have established bulk superconductivity in ultra-pure (99.9999\%) Bi single crystal at $\mathrm{T_C = 0.53}$ mK with an extrapolated upper critical field $\mathrm{H_C(0) = 5.2μ}$T measured along the [$0001$] (trigonal) -crystallographic direction. At very low concentrations of the charge carriers, we are dealing with fragile Cooper pairs with an estimated large coherence length $\mathrm{ξ_{GL}(0)\approx 96 μ}$m. We also stated that one needs to go beyond the conventional electron-phonon coupling (BCS-like) mechanism to understand the SC state in Bi. Bi is a compensated semi-metal with electrons and holes as charge carriers. In order to find the charge carriers responsible for the SC, we report the temperature dependence of the anisotropic critical field along the [$01\bar 10$] (bisectrix)-crystallographic direction and compared it with the earlier data from measurements along the trigonal. Our theoretical analysis of the anisotropy of critical fields suggests that the light electrons in the three pockets of Bi bands are responsible for the SC and indicates that Bi is an extremely weak type-II (close to type-I) superconductor. Finally, we review the current theories proposed to explain the SC in Bi.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.00053 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Optimizing one dimensional superconducting diodes: Interplay of Rashba spin-orbit coupling and magnetic fields
similarity 0.94Sayak Bhowmik et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2407.12455
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transport signatures of single and multiple Floquet Majorana modes in one-dimensional Rashba nanowire and Shiba chain
similarity 0.94Debashish Mondal et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2407.01135
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fermi arcs mediated transport in inversion symmetry-broken Weyl semimetal nanowire and its hybrid junctions
similarity 0.94Amartya Pal et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2402.07490
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Identifying Bogoliubov Fermi surfaces via thermoelectric response in a -wave superconductor heterostructure
similarity 0.93Amartya Pal et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2409.12157
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Challenges in detecting topological superconducting transitions via supercurrent and phase probes in planar Josephson junctions
similarity 0.93Pankaj Sharma & Narayan Mohanta · 2023 · arXiv:2307.11645
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transport signatures of Bogoliubov Fermi surfaces in normal metal/time-reversal symmetry broken -wave superconductor junctions
similarity 0.93Amartya Pal et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2308.07376
Source status unknown — claims are unverified