Epitaxially Driven Phase Selectivity of Sn in Hybrid Quantum Nanowires
Sabbir A. Khan, Sara Martí-Sánchez, Dags Olsteins, Charalampos Lampadaris, Damon James Carrad, Yu Liu, Judith Quiñones, Maria Chiara Spadaro, Thomas S. Jespersen, Peter Krogstrup, Jordi Arbiol
arXiv:2212.13314 · DOI 10.1021/acsnano.3c02733 · 2022-12-26 · ACS Nano
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Hybrid semiconductor/superconductor nanowires constitute a pervasive platform for studying gate-tunable superconductivity and the emergence of topological behavior. Their low-dimensionality and crystal structure flexibility facilitate novel heterostructure growth and efficient material optimization; crucial prerequisites for accurately constructing complex multi-component quantum materials. Here, we present an extensive optimization of Sn growth on InSb, InAsSb and InAs nanowires. We demonstrate how the growth conditions and the crystal structure/symmetry of the semiconductor drive the formation of either semi-metallic $\mathrm{α-Sn}$ or superconducting $\mathrm{β-Sn}$. For InAs nanowires, we obtain phase-pure, superconducting $\mathrm{β-Sn}$ shells. However, for InSb and InAsSb nanowires, an initial epitaxial $\mathrm{α-Sn}$ phase evolves into a polycrystalline shell of coexisting $\mathrmα$ and $\mathrmβ$ phases, where the $β/α$ volume ratio increases with Sn shell thickness. Whether these nanowires exhibit superconductivity or not critically relies on the $\mathrm{β-Sn}$ content. Therefore, this work provides key insights into Sn phase control on a variety of semiconductors, with consequences for the yield of superconducting hybrids suitable for generating topological systems.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sn Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
High magnetic field stability in a planar graphene-NbSe SQUID
similarity 1.00Ayelet Zalic et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2211.01020
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Excitonic Insulator to Superconductor Phase Transition in Ultra-Compressed Helium
similarity 1.00Cong Liu et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2301.06756
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in twisted bilayer WSe
similarity 1.00Yinjie Guo et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2406.03418
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Single domain stripe order in a high-temperature superconductor
similarity 1.00G. Simutis et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2204.02304
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Sensitive dependence of pairing symmetry on Ni- crystal field splitting in the nickelate superconductor LaNiO
similarity 0.99Chengliang Xia et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2311.07316
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A Tunable Monolithic SQUID in Twisted Bilayer Graphene
similarity 0.99Elías Portolés et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.13276
Source status unknown — claims are unverified