Performance Analysis of Superconductor-constriction-Superconductor Transmon Qubits
Mingzhao Liu, Charles T. Black
arXiv:2301.04276 · DOI 10.1103/physreva.110.012427 · 2023-01-11 · Physical Review A
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
This work presents a computational analysis of a superconducting transmon qubit design, in which the superconductor-insulator-superconductor (SIS) Josephson junction is replaced by a co-planar, superconductor-constriction-superconductor (ScS) nanobridge junction. Within the scope of Ginzburg-Landau theory, we find that the nanobridge ScS transmon has an improved charge dispersion compared to the SIS transmon, with a tradeoff of smaller anharmonicity. These calculations provide a framework for estimating the superconductor material properties and junction dimensions compatible with gigahertz frequency ScS transmon operation.
Similar papers
Performance analysis of superconductor-constriction-superconductor transmon qubits
similarity 0.93Mingzhao Liu (刘铭钊) & Charles T. Black
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Metastability in a nano-bridge based hysteretic DC-SQUID embedded in superconducting microwave resonator
similarity 0.89Eran Segev et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1007.5225
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
-mon: transmon with strong anharmonicity
similarity 0.87Hrishikesh Patel et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2308.02547
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase dynamics and dissipation in tunnel ferromagnetic Josephson junctions
similarity 0.87F. Calloni et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2605.18586
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Integration of topological insulator Josephson junctions in superconducting qubit circuits
similarity 0.87Tobias W. Schmitt et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2007.04224
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A superconducting qubit with noise-insensitive plasmon levels and decay-protected fluxon states
similarity 0.87Farid Hassani et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2202.13917
Source status unknown — claims are unverified