Single Flux Quantum-Based Digital Control of Superconducting Qubits in a Multi-Chip Module
Chuan-Hong Liu, Andrew Ballard, David Olaya, Daniel R. Schmidt, John Biesecker, Tammy Lucas, Joel Ullom, Shravan Patel, Owen Rafferty, Alexander Opremcak, Kenneth Dodge, Vito Iaia, Tianna McBroom, Jonathan L. Dubois, Pete F. Hopkins, Samuel P. Benz, Britton L. T. Plourde, Robert McDermott
arXiv:2301.05696 · DOI 10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.030310 · 2023-01-13 · PRX Quantum
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The single flux quantum (SFQ) digital superconducting logic family has been proposed for the scalable control of next-generation superconducting qubit arrays. In the initial implementation, SFQ-based gate fidelity was limited by quasiparticle (QP) poisoning induced by the dissipative on-chip SFQ driver circuit. In this work, we introduce a multi-chip module architecture to suppress phonon-mediated QP poisoning. Here, the SFQ elements and qubits are fabricated on separate chips that are joined with In bump bonds. We use interleaved randomized benchmarking to characterize the fidelity of SFQ-based gates, and we demonstrate an error per Clifford gate of 1.2(1)%, an order-of-magnitude reduction over the gate error achieved in the initial realization of SFQ-based qubit control. We use purity benchmarking to quantify the contribution of incoherent error at 0.96(2)%; we attribute this error to photon-mediated QP poisoning mediated by the resonant mm-wave antenna modes of the qubit and SFQ-qubit coupler. We anticipate that a straightforward redesign of the SFQ driver circuit to limit the bandwidth of the SFQ pulses will eliminate this source of infidelity, allowing SFQ-based gates with fidelity approaching theoretical limits, namely 99.9% for resonant sequences and 99.99% for more complex pulse sequences involving variable pulse-to-pulse separation.
Similar papers
Tuning charge-density wave order and superconductivity in the kagome metals KVSbSn and RbVSbSn
similarity 0.91Yuzki M. Oey et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2205.06317
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Elucidating the local atomic and electronic structure of amorphous oxidized superconducting niobium films
similarity 0.91Thomas F. Harrelson et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2111.11590
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Sudden adiabaticity entering field-induced state in UTe2
similarity 0.91Rico Schönemann et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2206.06508
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hamiltonian Extrema of an Arbitrary Flux-Biased Josephson Circuit
similarity 0.91A. Miano et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.03155
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multilayer microwave integrated quantum circuits for scalable quantum computing
similarity 0.90T. Brecht et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1509.01127
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reconstructing the polar interface of infinite-layer nickelate thin films
similarity 0.90Berit H. Goodge et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.03613
Source status unknown — claims are unverified