Mitigation of frequency collisions in superconducting quantum processors
Amr Osman, Jorge Fernàndez-Pendàs, Christopher Warren, Sandoko Kosen, Marco Scigliuzzo, Anton Frisk Kockum, Giovanna Tancredi, Anita Fadavi Roudsari, Jonas Bylander
arXiv:2303.04663 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.043001 · 2023-03-08 · Physical Review Research
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The reproducibility of qubit parameters is a challenge for scaling up superconducting quantum processors. Signal crosstalk imposes constraints on the frequency separation between neighboring qubits. The frequency uncertainty of transmon qubits arising from the fabrication process is attributed to deviations in the Josephson junction area, tunnel barrier thickness, and the qubit capacitor. We decrease the sensitivity to these variations by fabricating larger Josephson junctions and reduce the wafer-level standard deviation in resistance down to 2%. We characterize 32 identical transmon qubits and demonstrate the reproducibility of the qubit frequencies with a 40 MHz standard deviation (i.e. 1%) with qubit quality factors exceeding 2 million. We perform two-level-system (TLS) spectroscopy and observe no significant increase in the number of TLSs causing qubit relaxation. We further show by simulation that for our parametric-gate architecture, and accounting only for errors caused by the uncertainty of the qubit frequency, we can scale up to 100 qubits with an average of only 3 collisions between quantum-gate transition frequencies, assuming 2% crosstalk and 99.9% target gate fidelity.
Similar papers
Mitigation of frequency collisions in superconducting quantum processors
similarity 0.92Amr Osman et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A superconducting qubit as a quantum transformer routing entanglement between a microscopic quantum memory and a macroscopic resonator
similarity 0.90Alexander Kemp et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1008.4212
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
One- and two-photon spectroscopy of a flux qubit coupled to a microscopic defect
similarity 0.90A. Lupascu et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0810.0590
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Time-Domain Detection of Weakly Coupled TLS Fluctuators in Phase Qubits
similarity 0.89Allman, M. S. et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1004.2738
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Readout failures in superconducting qubits due to TLS-defects in tunnel junctions
similarity 0.89J. Lisenfeld et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2605.02755
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Gradiometric, Fully Tunable C-Shunted Flux Qubits
similarity 0.89Benedikt Berlitz et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2509.26024
Source status unknown — claims are unverified