Tuning microwave losses in superconducting resonators
Alex Gurevich
arXiv:2303.07491 · DOI 10.1088/1361-6668/acc214 · 2023-03-13 · Superconductor Science and Technology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Performance of superconducting resonators, particularly cavities for particle accelerators and micro cavities and thin film resonators for quantum computations and photon detectors has been improved substantially by recent materials treatments and technological advances. As a result, the niobium cavities have reached the quality factors $Q\sim 10^{11}$ at 1-2 GHz and 1.5 K and the breakdown radio-frequency (rf) fields $H$ close to the dc superheating field of the Meissner state. These advances raise the question whether the state-of-the-art cavities are close to the fundamental limits, what these limits actually are, and to what extent the $Q$ and $H$ limits can be pushed by the materials nano structuring and impurity management. These issues are also relevant to many applications using high-Q thin film resonators, including single-photon detectors and quantum circuits. This topical review outlines basic physical mechanisms of the rf nonlinear surface impedance controlled by quasiparticles, dielectric losses and trapped vortices, as well as the dynamic field limit of the Meissner state. Sections cover ways of engineering an optimum quasiparticle density of states and superfluid density to reduce rf losses and kinetic inductance by pairbreaking mechanisms related to magnetic impurities, rf currents, and proximity-coupled metallic layers at the surface. A section focuses on mechanisms of residual surface resistance which dominates rf losses at ultra low temperatures. Microwave losses of trapped vortices and their reduction by optimizing the concentration of impurities and pinning potential are also discussed.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ta Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Dynamic pair-breaking current, critical superfluid velocity and nonlinear electromagnetic response of nonequilibrium superconductors
similarity 0.93Ahmad Sheikhzada & Alex Gurevich · 2020 · arXiv:2008.12732
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-polarized proximity effect in superconducting junctions
similarity 0.89T. Yokoyama & Y. Tanaka · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0510008
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Peak effect at the weak- to strong pinning crossover
similarity 0.89J. A. G. Koopmann et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0401086
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of Impurities on the Superheating field of Type II superconductors
similarity 0.88F. Pei-Jen Lin & A. Gurevich · 2012 · arXiv:1202.5513
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Surface impedance and optimum surface resistance of a superconductor with imperfect surface
similarity 0.88Alex Gurevich & Takayuki Kubo · 2017 · arXiv:1711.03077
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Insight into bulk niobium superconducting RF cavities performances by tunneling spectroscopy
similarity 0.88N. R. Groll et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1805.06359
Source status unknown — claims are unverified