A model for critical current effects in point-contact Andreev-reflection spectroscopy
Dario Daghero, Erik Piatti, Nikolai D. Zhigadlo, Renato S. Gonnelli
arXiv:2303.15968 · DOI 10.1063/10.0019702 · 2023-03-28 · Low Temperature Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
It is well known that point-contact Andreev reflection spectroscopy provides reliable measurements of the energy gap(s) in a superconductor when the contact is in the ballistic or nearly-ballistic regime. However, especially when the mean free path of the material under study is small, obtaining ballistic contacts can be a major challenge. One of the signatures of a Maxwell contribution to the contact resistance is the presence of "dips" in the differential conductance, associated to the sudden appearance of a Maxwell term, in turn due to the attainment of the critical current of the material in the contact region. Here we show that, using a proper model for the $R(I)$ of the material under study, it is possible to fit the experimental curves (without the need of normalization) obtaining the correct values of the gap amplitudes even in the presence of such dips, as well as the temperature dependence of the critical current in the contact. We present a test of the procedure in the case of Andreev-reflection spectra in Mg$_{0.85}$Al$_{0.15}$B$_2$ single crystals.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mg0.85Al0.15B2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 27.8 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Mg0.85Al0.15B2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 25.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Cooper pairs localization in tree-like networks of superconducting islands
similarity 0.97F. Romeo & R. De Luca · 2021 · arXiv:2111.02909
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge-Density Waves vs. Superconductivity: Some Results and Future Perspectives
similarity 0.96Giulia Venditti & Sergio Caprara · 2023 · arXiv:2305.03404
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spectral properties of a mixed singlet-triplet Ising superconductor
similarity 0.96Sourabh Patil et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2307.03456
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Synthetic fractional flux quanta in a ring of superconducting qubits
similarity 0.96Luca Chirolli et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2409.06511
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hallmarks of non-trivial topology in Josephson junctions based on oxide nanochannels
similarity 0.94Alfonso Maiellaro et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2211.15433
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cluster charge-density-wave glass in hydrogen-intercalated TiSe
similarity 0.94Giacomo Prando et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2307.10979
Source status unknown — claims are unverified