← Back to search

Intrinsic surface superconducting instability in Type-I Weyl Semimetals

Aymen Nomani, Pavan Hosur

arXiv:2304.02635 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.165144 · 2023-04-05 · Physical Review B

T1experimental13 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Recent experiments on non-magnetic Weyl semimetals have seen separate bulk and surface superconductivity in Weyl semimetals, which raises the question of whether the surface Fermi arcs can support intrinsic superconductivity while the bulk stays in the normal state. A theoretical answer to this question is hindered by the absence of a well-defined surface Hamiltonian since the Fermi arcs merge with the bulk states at their endpoints. Using an alternate, Green's functions-based approach on a phenomenological model that can yield arbitrary Fermi arcs, we show -- within mean-field theory -- that the surface can support a standard Cooper instability while the bulk remains disordered. Although the surface has lower dimensionality, a higher density of states compared to the bulk allows it to have a higher mean-field superconducting transition temperature.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
PtBi2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

100Pressure not reportedunknown
PtBi2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

0.6Pressure not reportedunknown
NbP

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

7.5Pressure not reportedunknown
NbP

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

7.5Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers