Search for ambient superconductivity in the Lu-N-H system
Pedro P. Ferreira, Lewis J. Conway, Alessio Cucciari, Simone Di Cataldo, Federico Giannessi, Eva Kogler, Luiz T. F. Eleno, Chris J. Pickard, Christoph Heil, Lilia Boeri
arXiv:2304.04447 · DOI 10.1038/s41467-023-41005-2 · 2023-04-10 · Nature Communications
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Motivated by the recent report of room-temperature superconductivity at near-ambient pressure in N-doped lutetium hydride by Dasenbrock et al. [Nature 615, 244 (2023)], we performed a comprehensive, detailed study of the phase diagram of the Lu-N-H system, looking for superconducting phases. We combined ab initio crystal structure prediction with ephemeral data-derived interatomic potentials to sample over 200,000 different structures. Out of the more than 150 structures predicted to be metastable within $\sim$ 50 meV from the convex hull we identify 52 viable candidates for conventional superconductivity, for which we computed their superconducting properties from Density Functional Perturbation Theory. Although for some of these structures we do predict a finite superconducting $T_{\text{c}}$, none is even remotely compatible with room-temperature superconductivity as reported by Dasenbrock et al. Our work joins the broader community effort that has followed the report of near-ambient superconductivity, confirming beyond reasonable doubt that no conventional mechanism can explain the reported $T_{\text{c}}$ in Lu-N-H.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LuH Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 18.6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LuH3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 32 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LuH3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 55 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| LuH3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 38.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LuNH Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 16 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Lu2NH3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Lu3N2H3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Phase-engineering the Andreev band structure of a three-terminal Josephson junction
similarity 0.99M. Coraiola et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.14535
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Demonstration of dual Shapiro steps in small Josephson junctions
similarity 0.98Fabian Kaap et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2401.06599
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Elucidating the local atomic and electronic structure of amorphous oxidized superconducting niobium films
similarity 0.98Thomas F. Harrelson et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2111.11590
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nanoscale Control of Quantum States in Radical Molecules on Superconducting Pb(111)
similarity 0.98Chao Li et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.05115
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of low-temperature compression on superconductivity and crystal structure in strontium metal
similarity 0.98J. Lim et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.06128
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microwave-induced conductance replicas in hybrid Josephson junctions without Floquet-Andreev states
similarity 0.98D. Z. Haxell et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2212.03554
Source status unknown — claims are unverified