← Back to search

Constraints on the superconducting state of Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ from elastocaloric measurements

Grgur Palle, Clifford Hicks, Roser Valentí, Zhenhai Hu, You-Sheng Li, Andreas Rost, Michael Nicklas, Andrew P. Mackenzie, Jörg Schmalian

arXiv:2304.07182 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.094516 · 2023-04-14 · Physical Review B

T4experimental2 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Strontium ruthenate Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ is an unconventional superconductor whose pairing symmetry has not been fully clarified, despite more than two decades of intensive research. Recent NMR Knight shift experiments have rekindled the Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ pairing debate by giving strong evidence against all odd-parity pairing states, including chiral $p$-wave pairing that was for a long time the leading pairing candidate. Here, we exclude additional pairing states by analyzing recent elastocaloric measurements [YS. Li et al., Nature 607, 276--280 (2022)]. To be able to explain the elastocaloric experiment, we find that unconventional even-parity pairings must include either large $d_{x^2 - y^2}$-wave or large $\{d_{xz} \mid d_{yz}\}$-wave admixtures, where the latter possibility arises because of the body-centered point group symmetry. These $\{d_{xz} \mid d_{yz}\}$-wave admixtures take the form of distinctively body-centered-periodic harmonics that have horizontal line nodes. Hence $g_{xy(x^2-y^2)}$-wave and $d_{xy}$-wave pairings are excluded as possible dominant even pairing states.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Sr2RuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reported—

Similar papers