Vortex dynamics induced by scanning SQUID susceptometry
Logan Bishop-Van Horn, Eli Mueller, Kathryn A. Moler
arXiv:2304.13093 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.224509 · 2023-04-25 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We measured the local magnetic response of a niobium thin film by applying a millitesla-scale AC magnetic field using a micron-scale field coil and detecting the response with a micron-scale pickup loop in a scanning superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) susceptometry measurement. Near the film's critical temperature, we observed a step-like nonlinear and dissipative magnetic response due to the dynamics of a small number of vortex-antivortex pairs induced in the film by the local applied AC field. We modeled the dynamics of the measurement using a combined two-dimensional London-Maxwell and time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau approach, allowing us to construct a detailed real-space picture of the vortex motion causing the observed dissipative response. This work pushes scanning SQUID susceptometry of two-dimensional superconductors beyond the regime of linear response and lays the foundation for microscopic studies of vortex dynamics and pinning in superconducting devices and more exotic materials systems.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Controlled Manipulation of Individual Vortices in a Superconductor
similarity 0.89E. W. J. Straver et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0810.0790
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Perspective: Challenges and Transformative Opportunities in Superconductor Vortex Physics
similarity 0.89Serena Eley et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2105.00055
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetothermal instabilities in type II superconductors
similarity 0.89N. A. Taylanov · 2011 · arXiv:1111.1416
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex Quantum Nucleation and Tunneling in Superconducting Thin Films: Role of Dissipation and Periodic Pinning
similarity 0.89Roberto Iengo & Giancarlo Jug · 1996 · arXiv:cond-mat/9611112
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic-field dependence of the critical currents in a periodic coplanar array of narrow superconducting strip
similarity 0.88John R. Clem et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0708.3379
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Local magnetic response of superconducting SrRuO thin films and rings
similarity 0.88G. M. Ferguson et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2403.17152
Source status unknown — claims are unverified