Charge Stripe Manipulation of Superconducting Pairing Symmetry Transition
Chao Chen, Peigeng Zhong, Xuelei Sui, Runyu Ma, Ying Liang, Shijie Hu, Tianxing Ma, Hai-Qing Lin, Bing Huang
arXiv:2304.14254 · DOI 10.1038/s41467-024-53841-x · 2023-04-27 · Nature Communications
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Charge stripes have been widely observed in many different types of unconventional superconductors, holding varying periods ($\mathcal{P}$) and intensities. However, a general understanding on the interplay between charge stripes and superconducting properties is still incomplete. Here, using large-scale unbiased numerical simulations on a general inhomogeneous Hubbard model, we discover that the charge-stripe period $\mathcal{P}$, which is variable in different real material systems, could dictate the pairing symmetries -- $d$ wave for $\mathcal{P} \ge 4$, $s$ and $d$ waves for $\mathcal{P} \le 3$. In the latter, tuning hole doping and charge-stripe amplitude can trigger a $d$-$s$ wave transition and magnetic-correlation shift, where the $d$-wave state converts to a pairing-density wave state, competing with the $s$ wave. These interesting phenomena arise from an unusual stripe-induced selection rule of pairing symmetries around on-stripe region and within inter-stripe region, giving rise to a critical point of $\mathcal{P}=3$ for the phase transition. In general, our findings offer new insights into the differences in the superconducting pairing mechanisms across many $\mathcal{P}$-dependent superconducting systems, highlighting the decisive role of charge stripe.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La2CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CsV3Sb5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CsCr3Sb5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Pressure-induced superconductivity in flat-band Kagome compounds PdP(SSe)
similarity 0.97Shuo Li et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2203.15957
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced two-component superconductivity in CoSi2/TiSi2 heterojunctions
similarity 0.96Shao-Pin Chiu et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2202.08989
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coexistence of Multiple Stacking Charge Density Waves in Kagome Superconductor
similarity 0.96Qian Xiao et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.05211
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Moiré Engineering of Nonsymmorphic Symmetries and Hourglass Superconductors
similarity 0.96Yifan Gao et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2207.02806
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pseudogap and Strong Pairing Induced by Incipient and Shallow Bands in the Quasi-Two-Dimensional KCaFeAsF
similarity 0.96Jiahao Hao et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2111.04422
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pressure-tuned superconductivity in the Dirac semimetal PdTe
similarity 0.96Xiangming Kong et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2312.07238
Source status unknown — claims are unverified