Neural Wave Functions for Superfluids
Wan Tong Lou, Halvard Sutterud, Gino Cassella, W. M. C. Foulkes, Johannes Knolle, David Pfau, James S. Spencer
arXiv:2305.06989 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevX.14.021030 · 2023-05-11 · ArXiv
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Understanding superfluidity remains a major goal of condensed matter physics. Here we tackle this challenge utilizing the recently developed Fermionic neural network (FermiNet) wave function Ansatz [D. Pfau et al., Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033429 (2020).] for variational Monte Carlo calculations. We study the unitary Fermi gas, a system with strong, short-range, two-body interactions known to possess a superfluid ground state but difficult to describe quantitatively. We demonstrate key limitations of the FermiNet Ansatz in studying the unitary Fermi gas and propose a simple modification based on the idea of an antisymmetric geminal power singlet (AGPs) wave function. The new AGPs FermiNet outperforms the original FermiNet significantly in paired systems, giving results which are more accurate than fixed-node diffusion Monte Carlo and are consistent with experiment. We prove mathematically that the new Ansatz, which only differs from the original Ansatz by the method of antisymmetrization, is a strict generalization of the original FermiNet architecture, despite the use of fewer parameters. Our approach shares several advantages with the original FermiNet: the use of a neural network removes the need for an underlying basis set; and the flexibility of the network yields extremely accurate results within a variational quantum Monte Carlo framework that provides access to unbiased estimates of arbitrary ground-state expectation values. We discuss how the method can be extended to study other superfluids.
Similar papers
Tilted stripes origin in revealed by anisotropic next-nearest neighbor hopping
similarity 0.99Wei He et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.10264
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in black phosphorus and the role of dynamical screening
similarity 0.99Viktor Christiansson et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.11686
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Absence of magnetic interactions in Ni-Nb ferromagnet-superconductor bilayers
similarity 0.99Nathan Satchell et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2209.15366
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic impurities on superconducting Pb surfaces
similarity 0.99Ming-Hung Wu et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.12630
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase formation in hole- and electron-doped rare-earth nickelate single crystals
similarity 0.99P. Puphal et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2306.04157
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A quantum critical line bounds the high field metamagnetic transition surface in UTe
similarity 0.99Z. Wu et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2403.02535
Source status unknown — claims are unverified