← Back to search

Ion-selective scattering studied by the variable-energy electron irradiation of Ba$_{0.2}$K$_{0.8}$Fe$_2$As$_2$ superconductor

Kyuil Cho, M. Konczykowski, M. A. Tanatar, I. I. Mazin, Yong Liu, T. A. Lograsso, R. Prozorov

arXiv:2305.13217 · DOI 10.3390/ma16134520 · 2023-05-22 · Materials

T1experimental3 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Low-temperature variable-energy electron irradiation was used to induce non-magnetic disorder in a single crystal of hole-doped iron-based superconductor, Ba$_{1-x}$K$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$, $x=$0.80. To avoid systematic errors, the beam energy was adjusted non-consequently for five values between 1.0 and 2.5 MeV, whence sample resistance was measured in-situ at 22 K. For all energies, the resistivity raises linearly with the irradiation fluence suggesting the creation of uncorrelated dilute point-like disorder (confirmed by simulations). The rate of the resistivity increase peaks at energies below 1.5 MeV. Comparison with calculated partial cross-sections points to the predominant creation of defects in the iron sublattice. Simultaneously, superconducting $T_c$, measured separately between the irradiation runs, is monotonically suppressed as expected since it depends on the total scattering rate, hence total cross-section, which is a monotonically increasing function of energy. Our work confirms experimentally an often-made assumption of the dominant role of the iron sub-lattice in iron-based superconductors.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Ba0.2K0.8Fe2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

20.2Pressure not reportedonset
Ba0.2K0.8Fe2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

19.3Pressure not reportedzero_resistance

Similar papers