Rotation of gap nodes in the topological superconductor Cu$_x$(PbSe)$_5$(Bi$_2$Se$_3$)$_6$
Mahasweta Bagchi, Jens Brede, Aline Ramires, Yoichi Ando
arXiv:2305.16732 · 2023-05-26
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Among the family of odd-parity topological superconductors derived from $\mathrm{Bi}_{2}\mathrm{Se}_{3}$, $\mathrm{Cu}_{x}(\mathrm{PbSe})_{5}(\mathrm{Bi}_{2}\mathrm{Se}_{3})_{6}$ (CPSBS) has been elucidated to have gap nodes. Although the nodal gap structure has been established by specific-heat and thermal-conductivity measurements, there has been no direct observation of the superconducting gap of CPSBS using scanning tunnelling spectroscopy (STS). Here we report the first STS experiments on CPSBS down to 0.35 K, which found that the vortices generated by out-of-plane magnetic fields have an elliptical shape, reflecting the anisotropic gap structure. The orientation of the gap minima is found to be aligned with the bulk direction when the surface lattice image shows twofold symmetry, but, surprisingly, it is rotated by 30$^{\circ}$ when twofold symmetry is absent. In addition, the superconducting gap spectra in zero magnetic field suggest that the gap nodes are most likely lifted. We argue that only an emergent symmetry at the surface, allowing for a linear superposition of gap functions with different symmetries in the bulk, can lead to the rotation of the gap nodes. The absence of inversion symmetry at the surface additionally lifts the nodes. This result establishes the subtle but crucial role of crystalline symmetry in topological superconductivity.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cux(PbSe)5(Bi2Se3)6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Leading superconducting instabilities in three-dimensional models for Sr2RuO4
similarity 0.91Astrid T. Rømer et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2204.02880
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nodal gaps from local interactions in SrRuO
similarity 0.90Aline Ramires · 2021 · arXiv:2110.10621
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-pumping from a ferromagnetic insulator to an unconventional superconductor with interfacial Andreev bound-states
similarity 0.89Chi Sun & Jacob Linder · 2022 · arXiv:2212.08091
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Symmetry, nodal structure, and Bogoliubov Fermi surfaces for nonlocal pairing
similarity 0.89Carsten Timm & Ankita Bhattacharya · 2021 · arXiv:2107.01839
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of superconducting vortices carrying a temperature-dependent fraction of the flux quantum
similarity 0.89Yusuke Iguchi et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2301.12368
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Investigating the superconducting state of 2-NbS as seen by the vortex lattice
similarity 0.88A. Alshemi et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2404.19049
Source status unknown — claims are unverified