Unconventional nodal superconductivity in miassite Rh$_{17}$S$_{15}$
Hyunsoo Kim, Makariy A. Tanatar, Marcin Kończykowski, Udhara S. Kaluarachchi, Serafim Teknowijoyo, Kyuil Cho, Aashish Sapkota, John M. Wilde, Matthew J. Krogstad, Sergey L. Bud'ko, Philip M. R. Brydon, Paul C. Canfield, Ruslan Prozorov
arXiv:2306.00261 · 2023-06-01
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Unconventional superconductivity has long been believed to arise from a lab-grown correlated electronic system. Here we report compelling evidence of unconventional nodal superconductivity in a mineral superconductor \rhs. We investigated the temperature-dependent London penetration depth $Δλ(T)$ and disorder evolution of the critical temperature $T_c$ and upper critical field $H_{c2}(T)$ in synthetic miassite \rhs. We found a power-law behavior of $Δλ(T)\sim T^n$ with $n\approx 1.1$ at low temperatures below $0.3T_c$ ($T_c$ = 5.4 K), which is consistent with the presence of lines of the node in the superconducting gap of \rhs. The nodal character of the superconducting state in \rhs~was supported by the observed pairbreaking effect in $T_c$ and $H_{c2}(T)$ in samples with the controlled disorder that was introduced by low-temperature electron irradiation. We propose a nodal sign-changing superconducting gap in the $A_{1g}$ irreducible representation, which preserves the cubic symmetry of the crystal and is in excellent agreement with the superfluid density, $λ^2(0)/λ^2(T)$.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rh17S15 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5.31 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CuS Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ni3Bi2S2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.7 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Rh9S8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5.8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Sn Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Possible Coexistence of Antiferromagnetic and Ferromagnetic Spin Fluctuations in the Spin-triplet Superconductor UTe2 Revealed by 125Te NMR under Pressure
similarity 0.93Devi V. Ambika et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2206.06893
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge Density Fluctuations with Enhanced Superconductivity at the Proposed Nematic Quantum Critical Point
similarity 0.92Youzhe Chen et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.03956
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Scanning SQUID study of ferromagnetism and superconductivity in infinite-layer nickelates
similarity 0.92Ruby A. Shi et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2402.14559
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Signatures of a topological phase transition in a planar Josephson junction
similarity 0.91A. Banerjee et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.03453
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two-Fold Anisotropic Superconductivity in Bilayer T-MoTe
similarity 0.91Zizhong Li et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2409.09308
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Contrasting electron-phonon interaction between electron- and hole-doped cuprates
similarity 0.91Qinda Guo et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.01685
Source status unknown — claims are unverified