Zeeman and Orbital Driven Phase Transitions in Planar Josephson Junctions
D. Z. Haxell, M. Coraiola, D. Sabonis, M. Hinderling, S. C. ten Kate, E. Cheah, F. Krizek, R. Schott, W. Wegscheider, F. Nichele
arXiv:2306.01514 · DOI 10.1021/acsnano.3c04957 · 2023-06-02 · ACS Nano
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We perform supercurrent and tunneling spectroscopy measurements on gate-tunable InAs/Al Josephson junctions (JJs) in an in-plane magnetic field, and report on phase shifts in the current-phase relation measured with respect to an absolute phase reference. The impact of orbital effects is investigated by studying multiple devices with different superconducting lead sizes. At low fields, we observe gate-dependent phase shifts of up to ${\varphi_{0}=0.5π}$ which are consistent with a Zeeman field coupling to highly-transmissive Andreev bound states via Rashba spin-orbit interaction. A distinct phase shift emerges at larger fields, concomitant with a switching current minimum and the closing and reopening of the superconducting gap. These signatures of an induced phase transition, which might resemble a topological transition, scale with the superconducting lead size, demonstrating the crucial role of orbital effects. Our results elucidate the interplay of Zeeman, spin-orbit and orbital effects in InAs/Al JJs, giving new understanding to phase transitions in hybrid JJs and their applications in quantum computing and superconducting electronics.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Strong Negative Electrothermal Feedback in Thermal Kinetic Inductance Detectors
similarity 1.00Shubh Agrawal et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.12493
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Negative differential thermal conductance by photonic transport in electronic circuits
similarity 1.00Shobhit Saheb Dey et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2112.12627
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stability of thermally bistable states and their switching in superconducting weak link
similarity 1.00Sourav Biswas et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.04538
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Metal-bonded perovskite lead hydride with phonon-mediated superconductivity up to 46 K under atmospheric pressure
similarity 1.00Yong He et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.05263
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic and magnetic properties of Lu and LuH
similarity 1.00Shunda Zhang et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.11063
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Three-Tone Coherent Microwave Electromechanical Measurement of a Superfluid Helmholtz Resonator
similarity 1.00Sebastian Spence et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2307.01250
Source status unknown — claims are unverified