Negative electrohydrostatic pressure between superconducting bodies
Thomas J. Maldonado, Dung N. Pham, Alessio Amaolo, Alejandro W. Rodriguez, Hakan E. Türeci
arXiv:2307.04903 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.014508 · 2023-07-10 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
By applying a hydrodynamic representation of non-relativistic scalar electrodynamics to the superconducting order parameter, we predict a negative (attractive) pressure between planar superconducting bodies. For conventional superconductors with London penetration depth $λ_\text{L} \approx 100 \text{ nm}$, the pressure reaches tens of $\text{N/mm}^2$ at angstrom separations. The resulting surface energies are in better agreement with experimental values than those predicted by the Hartree-Fock theory, and the emergent electric-field screening length is comparable to that of the Thomas-Fermi theory. The model circumvents the bulk limitations of the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer and Ginzburg-Landau theories to the analysis of superconducting quantum devices.
Similar papers
DEC-QED: A flux-based 3D electrodynamic modeling approach to superconducting circuits and materials
similarity 0.90Dung N. Pham et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2212.12775
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Is electromagnetic gauge invariance spontaneously violated in superconductors?
similarity 0.89Martin Greiter · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0503400
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multi-Dimensional Coherent Spectroscopy of Light-Driven States and their Collective Modes in Multi-Band Superconductors
similarity 0.87Martin Mootz et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2310.03950
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transport equations for superconductors in the presence of spin interaction
similarity 0.87François Konschelle · 2014 · arXiv:1403.1797
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunable crossed Andreev reflection in a heterostructure consisting of ferromagnets, normal metal and superconductors
similarity 0.87Abhiram Soori · 2022 · arXiv:2203.00505
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin superfluidity and spin-orbit gauge symmetry fixing
similarity 0.87Bertrand Berche et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1202.4085
Source status unknown — claims are unverified