← Back to search

Charge response function probed by resonant inelastic x-ray scattering: the signature of electronic gaps of YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{7-δ}$

Giacomo Merzoni, Leonardo Martinelli, Lucio Braicovich, Nicholas B. Brookes, Floriana Lombardi, Francesco Rosa, Riccardo Arpaia, Marco Moretti Sala, Giacomo Ghiringhelli

arXiv:2307.06375 · 2023-07-12

T2theoretical4 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

In strongly correlated systems the complete determination of the dynamical susceptibility $χ(\textbf{q}, ω)$ is of special relevance because of the entwinement of the spin and charge components. Although Resonant Inelastic X-Ray Scattering (RIXS) spectra are directly related to both the charge ($χ''_c(\textbf{q}, ω)$) and the spin ($χ''_s(\textbf{q}, ω)$) contributions, only the latter has been extensively studied with RIXS so far. Here we show how to extract from RIXS spectra of high-$T_c$ superconducting cuprates relevant properties of $χ''_c$, such as the presence of the superconducting gap and of the pseudogap. In particular, we exploit the temperature dependence of the Cu L$_3$ edge RIXS spectra of underdoped YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{7-δ}$ at specific wave-vectors q. The signature of the two gaps is in the departure of the low energy Bosonic excitation continuum from the statistical temperature-dependence. This approach can be immediately used to investigate systematically the nature of the pseudogap in cuprates, thereby taking advantage of the RIXS technique that does not suffer the limitations of surface-sensitive electron spectroscopies. Its extension to other interesting materials is foreseen.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
YBa2Cu3O7-δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers